These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17624116)

  • 1. Vertical disparity affects shape and size judgments across surfaces separated in depth.
    O'Kane LM; Hibbard PB
    Perception; 2007; 36(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 17624116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contextual effects on perceived three-dimensional shape.
    O'Kane LM; Hibbard PB
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(11):1095-100. PubMed ID: 20363240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The distance used for scaling disparities is the same as the one used for scaling retinal size.
    van Damme W; Brenner E
    Vision Res; 1997 Mar; 37(6):757-64. PubMed ID: 9156220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis.
    Rogers BJ; Bradshaw MF
    Nature; 1993 Jan; 361(6409):253-5. PubMed ID: 8423851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vertical-size disparities are temporally integrated for slant perception.
    Fukuda K; Kaneko H; Matsumiya K
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2749-56. PubMed ID: 16600323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic death constancy.
    Collett TS; Schwarz U; Sobel EC
    Perception; 1991; 20(6):733-54. PubMed ID: 1816533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vertical-disparity gradients are processed independently in different depth planes.
    Duke PA; Howard IP
    Vision Res; 2005 Jul; 45(15):2025-35. PubMed ID: 15820519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The familiar-size cue to distance and stereoscopic depth perception.
    Predebon J
    Perception; 1993; 22(8):985-95. PubMed ID: 8190600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recovering 3-D shape: roles of absolute and relative disparity, retinal size, and viewing distance as studied with reverse-perspective stimuli.
    Dobias JJ; Papathomas TV
    Perception; 2013; 42(4):430-46. PubMed ID: 23866556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceived angular and linear size: the role of binocular disparity and visual surround.
    Kaneko H; Uchikawa K
    Perception; 1997; 26(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 9196687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant.
    Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shape analysis and stereopsis for human depth perception.
    Kumar T; Glaser DA
    Vision Res; 1992 Mar; 32(3):499-512. PubMed ID: 1604837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape.
    Cumming BG; Johnston EB; Parker AJ
    Nature; 1991 Jan; 349(6308):411-3. PubMed ID: 1992341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Specular reflections and the estimation of shape from binocular disparity.
    Muryy AA; Welchman AE; Blake A; Fleming RW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Feb; 110(6):2413-8. PubMed ID: 23341602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How vertical disparities assist judgements of distance.
    Brenner E; Smeets JB; Landy MS
    Vision Res; 2001; 41(25-26):3455-65. PubMed ID: 11718787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing vertical size disparities in distinct depth planes.
    Duke PA; Howard IP
    J Vis; 2012 Aug; 12(8):10. PubMed ID: 22904355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stereoscopic shape discrimination is well preserved across changes in object size.
    Norman JF; Swindle JM; Jennings LR; Mullins EM; Beers AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 19389660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stereoscopic matching and the aperture problem.
    van Dam LC; van Ee R
    Perception; 2004; 33(7):769-87. PubMed ID: 15460506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaction between the perceived shape of two objects.
    Brenner E; Landy MS
    Vision Res; 1999 Nov; 39(23):3834-48. PubMed ID: 10748919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.