282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1762430)
1. Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis.
Lotz JC; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC
J Biomech Eng; 1991 Nov; 113(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 1762430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part II--Nonlinear analysis.
Lotz JC; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC
J Biomech Eng; 1991 Nov; 113(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 1762431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stress distributions within the proximal femur during gait and falls: implications for osteoporotic fracture.
Lotz JC; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC
Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(4):252-61. PubMed ID: 7492864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsumoto T; Ohashi S; Matsuyama J; Tobita K; Kaneko M; Nakamura K
Bone; 2009 Aug; 45(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 19398043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study of stress variations in single-stance and sideways fall using image-based finite element analysis.
Faisal TR; Luo Y
Biomed Mater Eng; 2016 May; 27(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 27175463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental validation of finite element model for proximal composite femur using optical measurements.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Amin Yavari S; Weinans H; Jurvelin JS; Zadpoor AA; Isaksson H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 May; 21():86-94. PubMed ID: 23510970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of femoral fracture load using finite element models: an examination of stress- and strain-based failure theories.
Keyak JH; Rossi SA
J Biomech; 2000 Feb; 33(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 10653034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Femoral fracture load and fracture pattern is accurately predicted using a gradient-enhanced quasi-brittle finite element model.
Haider IT; Goldak J; Frei H
Med Eng Phys; 2018 May; 55():1-8. PubMed ID: 29551293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models.
Keyak JH
Med Eng Phys; 2001 Apr; 23(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 11410381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robust QCT/FEA models of proximal femur stiffness and fracture load during a sideways fall on the hip.
Dragomir-Daescu D; Op Den Buijs J; McEligot S; Dai Y; Entwistle RC; Salas C; Melton LJ; Bennet KE; Khosla S; Amin S
Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Feb; 39(2):742-55. PubMed ID: 21052839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A robust 3D finite element simulation of human proximal femur progressive fracture under stance load with experimental validation.
Hambli R; Allaoui S
Ann Biomed Eng; 2013 Dec; 41(12):2515-27. PubMed ID: 23864338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repeatability of digital image correlation for measurement of surface strains in composite long bones.
Väänänen SP; Amin Yavari S; Weinans H; Zadpoor AA; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
J Biomech; 2013 Jul; 46(11):1928-32. PubMed ID: 23791085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of the pathological fracture risk during stance and fall-loading configurations for metastases in the proximal femur, using a computed tomography-based finite element method.
Shinoda Y; Kobayashi H; Kaneko M; Ohashi S; Bessho M; Hayashi N; Oka H; Imanishi J; Sawada R; Ogura K; Tanaka S; Haga N; Kawano H
J Orthop Sci; 2019 Nov; 24(6):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 31521453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Orthotropic HR-pQCT-based FE models improve strength predictions for stance but not for side-way fall loading compared to isotropic QCT-based FE models of human femurs.
Luisier B; Dall'Ara E; Pahr DH
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():287-299. PubMed ID: 24508715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of boundary conditions, impact loading and hydraulic stiffening on femoral fracture strength.
Haider IT; Speirs AD; Frei H
J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(13):2115-21. PubMed ID: 23906770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load.
Keyak JH; Falkinstein Y
Med Eng Phys; 2003 Nov; 25(9):781-7. PubMed ID: 14519351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the internal reaction forces, energy absorption, and fracture in the hip during simulated sideways fall impact.
Fleps I; Enns-Bray WS; Guy P; Ferguson SJ; Cripton PA; Helgason B
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0200952. PubMed ID: 30114192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonlinear quasi-static finite element simulations predict in vitro strength of human proximal femora assessed in a dynamic sideways fall setup.
Varga P; Schwiedrzik J; Zysset PK; Fliri-Hofmann L; Widmer D; Gueorguiev B; Blauth M; Windolf M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Apr; 57():116-27. PubMed ID: 26708740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
