These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17624444)

  • 1. Generalized alternating stimulation: a novel method to reduce stimulus artifact in electrically evoked compound action potentials.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldan C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Sep; 165(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 17624444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An improved masker-probe method for stimulus artifact reduction in electrically evoked compound action potentials.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldan C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Oct; 175(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 18771694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing blanking artifact in electrically evoked compound action potentials.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2010 Mar; 97(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 19833406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab.
    Bahmer A; Peter O; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug; 191(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 20558202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. amplitude growth functions.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 22209768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses after electrical stimulation with biphasic, triphasic and precision triphasic pulses.
    Bahmer A; Polak M; Baumann U
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):75-85. PubMed ID: 19850116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):143-56. PubMed ID: 15953524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: II. recovery functions.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):212-20. PubMed ID: 22202890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of stimulus attenuation in cochlear implants.
    Smit JE; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jun; 180(2):363-73. PubMed ID: 19464523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Rubinstein JT
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 15732375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrically evoked compound action potentials of guinea pig and cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Rubinstein JT; Robinson BK; Matsuoka AJ; Woodworth G
    Hear Res; 1998 May; 119(1-2):142-54. PubMed ID: 9641327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of intra- versus post-operatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potentials.
    van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; van Zanten GA
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):589-94. PubMed ID: 17062500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of Stimulus Polarity and Artifact Reduction Method on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
    Hughes ML; Goehring JL; Baudhuin JL
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):332-343. PubMed ID: 28045836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of electrical pulse polarity shape on intra cochlear neural responses in humans: Triphasic pulses with anodic and cathodic second phase.
    Herrmann DP; Kretzer KVA; Pieper SH; Bahmer A
    Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 412():108375. PubMed ID: 34749281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
    Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Jeng FC
    Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):75-86. PubMed ID: 15567605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Physiological Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implants.
    Spitzer ER; Hughes ML
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):786-798. PubMed ID: 28972468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of Alternating Polarity and Forward Masking Artifact-Reduction Methods to Resolve the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
    Baudhuin JL; Hughes ML; Goehring JL
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):e247-55. PubMed ID: 26928001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 5. refractory recovery and facilitation.
    Cohen LT
    Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 248(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19110048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.