148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17624444)
1. Generalized alternating stimulation: a novel method to reduce stimulus artifact in electrically evoked compound action potentials.
Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldan C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Sep; 165(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 17624444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An improved masker-probe method for stimulus artifact reduction in electrically evoked compound action potentials.
Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldan C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Oct; 175(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 18771694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing blanking artifact in electrically evoked compound action potentials.
Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2010 Mar; 97(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 19833406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab.
Bahmer A; Peter O; Baumann U
J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug; 191(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 20558202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. amplitude growth functions.
Bahmer A; Baumann U
J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 22209768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses after electrical stimulation with biphasic, triphasic and precision triphasic pulses.
Bahmer A; Polak M; Baumann U
Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):75-85. PubMed ID: 19850116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):143-56. PubMed ID: 15953524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: II. recovery functions.
Bahmer A; Baumann U
J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):212-20. PubMed ID: 22202890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of stimulus attenuation in cochlear implants.
Smit JE; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jun; 180(2):363-73. PubMed ID: 19464523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Rubinstein JT
Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 15732375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrically evoked compound action potentials of guinea pig and cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation.
Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Rubinstein JT; Robinson BK; Matsuoka AJ; Woodworth G
Hear Res; 1998 May; 119(1-2):142-54. PubMed ID: 9641327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of intra- versus post-operatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potentials.
van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; van Zanten GA
Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):589-94. PubMed ID: 17062500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of Stimulus Polarity and Artifact Reduction Method on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
Hughes ML; Goehring JL; Baudhuin JL
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):332-343. PubMed ID: 28045836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of electrical pulse polarity shape on intra cochlear neural responses in humans: Triphasic pulses with anodic and cathodic second phase.
Herrmann DP; Kretzer KVA; Pieper SH; Bahmer A
Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 412():108375. PubMed ID: 34749281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials.
Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Jeng FC
Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):75-86. PubMed ID: 15567605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Physiological Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implants.
Spitzer ER; Hughes ML
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):786-798. PubMed ID: 28972468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison of Alternating Polarity and Forward Masking Artifact-Reduction Methods to Resolve the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
Baudhuin JL; Hughes ML; Goehring JL
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):e247-55. PubMed ID: 26928001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
Clay KM; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 5. refractory recovery and facilitation.
Cohen LT
Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 248(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19110048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
