These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17624779)

  • 1. Interval breast cancers in screening: the effect of mammography review method on classification.
    Ciatto S; Catarzi S; Lamberini MP; Risso G; Saguatti G; Abbattista T; Martinelli F; Houssami N
    Breast; 2007 Dec; 16(6):646-52. PubMed ID: 17624779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality assessment of the mammographic screening programme in the Azienda Sanitaria locale Provincia Milano 1 -- analysis of interval cancers and discussion of possible causes of diagnostic error.
    Burani R; Caimi F; Maggioni C; Marinoni G; Pellizzoni R; Pirola ME; Villa R; Ciatto S
    Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 15775895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of mammography screening in the Milan programme: evidence of improved sensitivity based on interval cancer proportional incidence and radiological review.
    Elena PM; Nehmat H; Ermes M; Piera C; Maria Q; Guia M; Francesco C; Roberto V; Giovanni F; Isabella G; Stefano C
    Breast; 2009 Jun; 18(3):208-10. PubMed ID: 19359176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program.
    Hofvind S; Skaane P; Vitak B; Wang H; Thoresen S; Eriksen L; Bjørndal H; Braaten A; Bjurstam N
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):437-43. PubMed ID: 16244251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of interval cancers observed in an Italian mammography screening programme (2000-2006).
    Caumo F; Vecchiato F; Pellegrini M; Vettorazzi M; Ciatto S; Montemezzi S
    Radiol Med; 2009 Sep; 114(6):907-14. PubMed ID: 19551342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A true screening environment for review of interval breast cancers: pilot study to reduce bias.
    Gordon PB; Borugian MJ; Warren Burhenne LJ
    Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 17848684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
    Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Radiologic analysis of interval cancers in the screening program called Florence Woman Project].
    Morrone D; Giorgi D; Ciatto S; Ceresatto E; Catarzi S; Roselli Del Turco R
    Radiol Med; 2000 Nov; 100(5):321-5. PubMed ID: 11213408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Breast carcinoma diagnosed in mammographic screening incidentally. Research on the radiologic signs in prior mammograms].
    Marra V; Frigerio A; Di Virgilio MR; Menna S; Burke P
    Radiol Med; 1999 Nov; 98(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 10780212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: a prospected population based study in the south of The Netherlands.
    Klompenhouwer EG; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; de Haan AF; Wauters CA; Broeders MJ; Duijm LE
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 25573788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interval cancer peer review in East Anglia: implications for monitoring doctors as well as the NHS breast screening programme.
    Britton PD; McCann J; O'Driscoll D; Hunnam G; Warren RM
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Jan; 56(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11162697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classifying interval cancers.
    Duncan AA; Wallis MG
    Clin Radiol; 1995 Nov; 50(11):774-7. PubMed ID: 7489628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A blind review and an informed review of interval breast cancer cases in the Limburg screening programme, the Netherlands.
    de Rijke JM; Schouten LJ; Schreutelkamp JL; Jochem I; Verbeek AL
    J Med Screen; 2000; 7(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 10807142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers in screening programmes.
    Houssami N; Irwig L; Ciatto S
    Lancet Oncol; 2006 Mar; 7(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 16510335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.
    Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiological review of interval cancers in an Australian mammographic screening programme. Radiology Quality Assurance Group of BreastScreen Victoria.
    Amos AF; Kavanagh AM; Cawson J
    J Med Screen; 2000; 7(4):184-9. PubMed ID: 11202584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reviewing interval cancers: time well spent?
    Gower-Thomas K; Fielder HM; Branston L; Greening S; Beer H; Rogers C
    Clin Radiol; 2002 May; 57(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 12014936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography.
    Warren Burhenne LJ; Wood SA; D'Orsi CJ; Feig SA; Kopans DB; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Tabar L; Vyborny CJ; Castellino RA
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 10796939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award.
    Harvey JA; Fajardo LL; Innis CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec; 161(6):1167-72. PubMed ID: 8249720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.