162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17625616)
1. Effects of attachment design on strains around implants supporting overdentures.
Cekiç C; Akça K; Cehreli MC
Quintessence Int; 2007 Jun; 38(6):e291-7. PubMed ID: 17625616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of cantilevered bar length on strain around two implants supporting a mandibular overdenture.
Elsyad MA; Al-Mahdy YF; Salloum MG; Elsaih EA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):e143-50. PubMed ID: 23748333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Strain characteristics of Marburg double crown-retained implant overdentures compared with bar and ball-retained implant overdentures, with and without a rigid major connector.
Kazokoğlu FŞ; Akaltan F
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1416-24. PubMed ID: 24969407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress transfer of four mandibular implant overdenture cantilever designs.
Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 15507904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Load Transfer Characteristics of Three-Implant-Retained Overdentures with Different Interimplant Distances.
Tokar E; Uludag B; Karacaer O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 28291854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Load Transfer Characteristics of Various Designs of Three-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures.
Tokar E; Uludag B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1061-7. PubMed ID: 26394342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 11005906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Resilient Stud Versus Bar Attachments for Inclined Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures. An In Vitro Study of Loading and Dislodging Strains.
Elhelbawy NG; ELsyad MA; Soliman TA; Mahrous A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(5):982-988. PubMed ID: 36170313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prosthetic complications with mandibular bar-retained implant overdentures having distal attachments and metal frameworks: A 2- to 12-year retrospective analysis.
Ciftci G; Somay SD; Ozcan I; Ozcelik TB; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct; 130(4):573-580. PubMed ID: 34998584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandibular Denture Base Deformation with Locator and Ball Attachments of Implant-Retained Overdentures.
ELsyad MA; Errabti HM; Mustafa AZ
J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):656-664. PubMed ID: 26376338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants.
Machado AC; Cardoso L; Brandt WC; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2332-6. PubMed ID: 22134270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of Low-Profile Stud Attachment Configurations on Stress Distribution Characteristics of Implant-Retained Overdentures.
Tokar E; Uludag B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):754-763. PubMed ID: 30024990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA.
Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
