40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17628041)
21. [Superiority, equivalence and not inferiority studies for clinical trials].
Attanasio E
Prof Inferm; 2006; 59(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 16824361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. ['Non-inferiority' trials. Tips for the critical reader. Research methodology 3].
Soonawala D; Dekkers OM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(19):A4665. PubMed ID: 22571548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Review and evaluation of methods for computing confidence intervals for the ratio of two proportions and considerations for non-inferiority clinical trials.
Dann RS; Koch GG
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(1):85-107. PubMed ID: 15702607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [How I explore ... a risk difference in the occurrence of an event in clinical trials].
Scheen AJ; Ernest P; Jandrain B
Rev Med Liege; 2012 Nov; 67(11):597-602. PubMed ID: 23346831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects and non-effects of paired identical observations in comparing proportions with binary matched-pairs data.
Agresti A; Min Y
Stat Med; 2004 Jan; 23(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 14695640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Understanding the odds ratio and the relative risk.
Simon SD
J Androl; 2001; 22(4):533-6. PubMed ID: 11451349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. How to make clinical decisions from statistics.
David MC
Clin Exp Optom; 2006 May; 89(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 16637974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluating "superiority", "equivalence" and "non-inferiority" in clinical trials.
Turan FN; Senocak M
Ann Saudi Med; 2007; 27(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17684429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. On testing proportional odds assumptions for proportional odds models.
Liu A; He H; Tu XM; Tang W
Gen Psychiatr; 2023; 36(3):e101048. PubMed ID: 37565234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Short History of Confidence Intervals: Or, Don't Ask "Does the Treatment Work?" but "How Sure Are You That It Works?".
Sandercock PA
Stroke; 2015 Aug; 46(8):e184-7. PubMed ID: 26106115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Multivariate tests for multiple endpoints in clinical trials.
Follmann D
Stat Med; 1995 Jun; 14(11):1163-75. PubMed ID: 7667558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Active-control trials with binary data: a comparison of methods for testing superiority or non-inferiority using the odds ratio.
Siqueira AL; Whitehead A; Todd S
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(3):353-70. PubMed ID: 17628041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Issues on the selection of non-inferiority margin in clinical trials.
Hou Y; Wu XY; Li K
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):466-70. PubMed ID: 19302756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Methodological and statistical aspects of equivalence and non inferiority trials].
Elie C; De Rycke Y; Jais JP; Marion-Gallois R; Landais P
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Aug; 56(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 18703296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. How to deal with multiple treatment or dose groups in randomized clinical trials?
Hothorn LA
Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):137-54. PubMed ID: 17391286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Statistical notes. From superiority to non-inferiority clinical trials: a leap in the dark?].
Marubini E; Rebora P; Reina G
Ital Heart J Suppl; 2004 Sep; 5(9):712-9. PubMed ID: 15568609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [New Search]
