BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17628247)

  • 1. Cephalometric evaluation of symmetric and asymmetric extraction treatment for patients with Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson G; Carvalho PE; Cançado RH; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 17628247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentoskeletal treatment changes in Class II subdivision malocclusions in submentovertex and posteroanterior radiographs.
    Janson G; Cruz KS; Woodside DG; Metaxas A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Oct; 126(4):451-63. PubMed ID: 15470348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alignment stability in Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Busato MC; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; de Freitas LM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 16905063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Janson M; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 18538250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft-tissue treatment changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion with and without extraction of maxillary premolars.
    Janson G; Fuziy A; de Freitas MR; Castanha Henriques JF; de Almeida RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):729.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18068588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occlusal and cephalometric Class II Division 1 malocclusion severity in patients treated with and without extraction of 2 maxillary premolars.
    Janson G; Graciano JT; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):759-67. PubMed ID: 16769494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term stability of Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Leon-Salazar V; Leon-Salazar R; Janson M; de Freitas MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):154.e1-10; discussion 154-5. PubMed ID: 19651339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment stability in patients with Class II malocclusion treated with 2 maxillary premolar extractions or without extractions.
    Janson G; Camardella LT; Araki JD; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 20620829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class II subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Lenza EB; Francisco R; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Garib D; Lenza MA
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Dec; 18(1):39. PubMed ID: 29199373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Waters D; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols.
    Janson G; Barros SE; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):490-8. PubMed ID: 17920502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orthodontic treatment time in 2- and 4-premolar-extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Maria FR; Barros SE; Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):666-71. PubMed ID: 16679207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cephalometric assessment of dentofacial vertical changes in Class I subjects treated with and without extraction.
    Sivakumar A; Valiathan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):869-75. PubMed ID: 18538251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
    Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment of a Class II subdivision malocclusion with multiple congenitally missing teeth.
    Janson G; Camardella LT; de Freitas MR; de Almeida RR; Martins DR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):663-70. PubMed ID: 19409350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of the cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Simão TM; Barros SE; Janson M; de Freitas MR
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 21490991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Occlusal outcomes and efficiency of 1- and 2-phase protocols in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Cançado RH; Pinzan A; Janson G; Henriques JF; Neves LS; Canuto CE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):245-53; quiz 328.e1-2. PubMed ID: 18249291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of camouflage treatment on dentofacial structures in Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathic patients.
    Demir A; Uysal T; Sari Z; Basciftci FA
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):524-31. PubMed ID: 16049038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.