241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17628248)
1. Influence of chin prominence on esthetic lip profile preferences.
Coleman GG; Lindauer SJ; Tüfekçi E; Shroff B; Best AM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 17628248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Facial profile preferences among various layers of Turkish population.
Türkkahraman H; Gökalp H
Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):640-7. PubMed ID: 15529499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of lower lip position on the perceived attractiveness of chin prominence.
Modarai F; Donaldson JC; Naini FB
Angle Orthod; 2013 Sep; 83(5):795-800. PubMed ID: 23530543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored Japanese facial profiles.
Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 16102406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of preferences in lip position using computer animated imaging.
Hier LA; Evans CA; BeGole EA; Giddon DB
Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 10371428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Esthetic preferences for facial soft tissue profiles.
Sukhia RH; Khan M; Fida M; Shaikh A; Azam SI
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):17-23. PubMed ID: 22031990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A comparative study of cephalometric evaluation criteria of the cutaneous profile].
De Coster T
Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 2():559-72. PubMed ID: 1749613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness.
Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Facial profile preferences: differences in the perception of children with and without orthodontic history.
Cala L; Spalj S; Slaj M; Lapter MV; Slaj M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):442-450. PubMed ID: 20889049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Esthetic smile preferences and the orientation of the maxillary occlusal plane.
Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Naylor WP; Maveli TC
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Dec; 108(6):354-61. PubMed ID: 23217467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible.
Orsini MG; Huang GJ; Kiyak HA; Ramsay DS; Bollen AM; Anderson NK; Giddon DB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 16979485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Influence of chin prominence on anterior-posterior lip positions of facial profile].
Su YY; Wang CL; Liu DX; Dong RP; Li H
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Dec; 17(6):598-602. PubMed ID: 19148446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Asymmetry of the lips of orthognathic surgery patients.
Yamashita Y; Nakamura Y; Shimada T; Nomura Y; Hirashita A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 19815159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anteroposterior position of mandible and perceived need for orthognathic surgery.
de Almeida MD; Bittencourt MA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 67(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 19070751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular advancement and setback surgery an average of 12 years postoperatively.
Eggensperger NM; Lieger O; Thüer U; Iizuka T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 65(11):2301-10. PubMed ID: 17954329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Study on perception of Shanghai population with labial profile].
Tang GH; Ji GP; Ding XJ
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2003 Apr; 12(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 14661511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of lip positions in ancient Buddhas with Japanese adults.
Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 17203581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
