These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17628248)
21. Comparison of soft and hard tissue profiles of orthognathic surgery patients treated recently and 20 years earlier. Papadopoulos MA; Lazaridou-Terzoudi T; Øland J; Athanasiou AE; Melsen B Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e8-13. PubMed ID: 19540447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Profile preferences of Korean American orthodontic patients and orthodontists. Park YS; Evans CA; Viana G; Anderson NK; Giddon DB World J Orthod; 2006; 7(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 17009479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients. Stephens CK; Boley JC; Behrents RG; Alexander RG; Buschang PH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 16214626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients. Germeç D; Taner TU Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 18405818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of lips on the perception of malocclusion. Scott CR; Goonewardene MS; Murray K Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):152-62. PubMed ID: 16905058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Investigation on facial profile preferences of orthodontic patients]. Wang YY; Guo CC; Zhou C; Fan ML; Wang WC; Bao BC Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Dec; 21(6):668-72. PubMed ID: 23364553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Perceived relative attractiveness of facial profiles with varying degrees of skeletal anomalies. Hönn M; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G J Orofac Orthop; 2005 May; 66(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 15959632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women. Michiels G; Sather AH Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 7989819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Changes in esthetic standards since 1940. Berneburg M; Dietz K; Niederle C; Göz G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):450.e1-9; discussion 450-1. PubMed ID: 20362894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of well-balanced lip position by Japanese orthodontic patients. Shimomura T; Ioi H; Nakata S; Counts AL Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):e291-7. PubMed ID: 21457834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians. Cochrane SM; Cunningham SJ; Hunt NP Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 10895644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Perception of the maxillary incisor position with respect to the protrusion of nose and chin. Agostino P; Butti AC; Poggio CE; Salvato A Prog Orthod; 2007; 8(2):230-9. PubMed ID: 18030369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Tooth shape preferences in an esthetic smile. Anderson KM; Behrents RG; McKinney T; Buschang PH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 16214627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of preferred lip position according to different tip rotations of the nose in class I young adult subjects. Feghali J; Khoury E; Souccar NM; Akl R; Ghoubril J Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 31231000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Changes in facial profile of young adults with normal occlusion: a longitudinal study. Tibana RH; Palagi LM; Carneiro MS; Almeida MA; Miguel JA World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18575305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An evaluation of preferred lip positions according to different age groups. Park NS; Park JH; Bayome M; Mo SS; Kim Y; Kook YA Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 42(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 23141151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A cephalometric investigation of the surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. Aaronson SA Angle Orthod; 1967 Oct; 37(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 5234003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Predicting lower lip and chin response to mandibular advancement and genioplasty. Veltkamp T; Buschang PH; English JD; Bates J; Schow SR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Dec; 122(6):627-34. PubMed ID: 12490874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]