These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17629609)

  • 61. Optical focusing inside scattering media with time-reversed ultrasound microbubble encoded light.
    Ruan H; Jang M; Yang C
    Nat Commun; 2015 Nov; 6():8968. PubMed ID: 26597439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Simulation of noninvasive blood pressure estimation using ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Li F; Wang L; Fan Y; Li D
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Apr; 59(4):715-26. PubMed ID: 22547282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Analysis of echo signal from single ultrasound contrast microbubble using a reversible jump MCMC algorithm.
    Yan Y; Hopgood JR; Sboros V
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():1273-6. PubMed ID: 18002195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Very Low Frequency Radial Modulation for Deep Penetration Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging.
    Jing B; Lindsey BD
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 Mar; 48(3):530-545. PubMed ID: 34972572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Ultrafast 2-dimensional image monitoring and array-based passive cavitation detection for ultrasound contrast agent destruction in a variably sized region.
    Xu S; Hu H; Jiang H; Xu Z; Wan M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1957-70. PubMed ID: 25336483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Amplitude-modulation chirp imaging for contrast detection.
    Li ML; Kuo YC; Yeh CK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1535-45. PubMed ID: 20800180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Detection of individual microbubbles of ultrasound contrast agents: imaging of free-floating and targeted bubbles.
    Klibanov AL; Rasche PT; Hughes MS; Wojdyla JK; Galen KP; Wible JH; Brandenburger GH
    Invest Radiol; 2004 Mar; 39(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 15076011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Phantom investigation of phase-inversion-based dual-frequency excitation imaging for improved contrast display.
    Shen CC; Su SY; Cheng CH; Yeh CK
    Ultrasonics; 2012 Jan; 52(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21708393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Acoustic characterization of contrast-to-tissue ratio and axial resolution for dual-frequency contrast-specific acoustic angiography imaging.
    Lindsey BD; Rojas JD; Martin KH; Shelton SE; Dayton PA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Oct; 61(10):1668-87. PubMed ID: 25265176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Italian Society of Cardiovascular Echography (SIEC) Consensus Conference on the state of the art of contrast echocardiography.
    Ital Heart J; 2004 Apr; 5(4):309-34. PubMed ID: 15185894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The response of phospholipid-encapsulated microbubbles to chirp-coded excitation: implications for high-frequency nonlinear imaging.
    Shekhar H; Doyley MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3145-58. PubMed ID: 23654417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Effect of microbubble ligation to cells on ultrasound signal enhancement: implications for targeted imaging.
    Lankford M; Behm CZ; Yeh J; Klibanov AL; Robinson P; Lindner JR
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Oct; 41(10):721-8. PubMed ID: 16971795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Light propagation in a turbid medium with insonified microbubbles.
    Leung TS; Honeysett JE; Stride E; Deng J
    J Biomed Opt; 2013 Jan; 18(1):15002. PubMed ID: 23292610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Ultrasound Contrast Plane Wave Imaging Based on Bubble Wavelet Transform: In Vitro and In Vivo Validations.
    Wang D; Zong Y; Yang X; Hu H; Wan J; Zhang L; Bouakaz A; Wan M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1584-97. PubMed ID: 27067280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Potential contrast improvement in ultrasound pulse inversion imaging using EMD and EEMD.
    Liao AH; Shen CC; Li PC
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):317-26. PubMed ID: 20178898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. An iterative fullwave simulation approach to multiple scattering in media with randomly distributed microbubbles.
    Joshi A; Lindsey BD; Dayton PA; Pinton G; Muller M
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(10):4202-4217. PubMed ID: 28266925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Quantitative ultrasound molecular imaging.
    Yeh JS; Sennoga CA; McConnell E; Eckersley R; Tang MX; Nourshargh S; Seddon JM; Haskard DO; Nihoyannopoulos P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 41(9):2478-96. PubMed ID: 26044707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Acoustic signatures of submicron contrast agents.
    Patel DN; Bloch SH; Dayton PA; Ferrara KW
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Mar; 51(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 15128216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents for diagnostic and therapeutic applications: current status and future design.
    Kang ST; Yeh CK
    Chang Gung Med J; 2012; 35(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 22537927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The polydisperse acoustic signature of rigid microbubbles.
    Dermitzakis A; Butler MB; Thomas DH; Sboros V
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():133-6. PubMed ID: 26736218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.