103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1762975)
1. A comparison of transparent adherent and dry sterile gauze dressings for long-term central catheters in patients undergoing bone marrow transplant.
Shivnan JC; McGuire D; Freedman S; Sharkazy E; Bosserman G; Larson E; Grouleff P
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1991; 18(8):1349-56. PubMed ID: 1762975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of central venous catheter dressings in bone marrow transplant recipients.
Brandt B; DePalma J; Irwin M; Shogan J; Lucke JF
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1996 Jun; 23(5):829-36. PubMed ID: 8792352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison and cost-effectiveness analysis of peripheral catheter dressings.
Salles FT; Santos VL; Secoli SR; Aron S; Debbio CB; Baptista CC; Rogenski NM
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2007 Sep; 53(9):26-33. PubMed ID: 17893427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two different time interval protocols for central venous catheter dressing in bone marrow transplant patients: results of a randomized, multicenter study. The Italian Nurse Bone Marrow Transplant Group (GITMO).
Laura R; Degl'Innocenti M; Mocali M; Alberani F; Boschi S; Giraudi A; Arnaud MT; Zucchinali R; Paris MG; Dallara R; Thaler S; Perobelli G; Parfazi S; De Lazzer T; Peron G
Haematologica; 2000 Mar; 85(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 10702816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective, randomized trial of gauze and two polyurethane dressings for site care of pulmonary artery catheters: implications for catheter management.
Maki DG; Stolz SS; Wheeler S; Mermel LA
Crit Care Med; 1994 Nov; 22(11):1729-37. PubMed ID: 7956275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved long-term maintenance of central venous catheters with a new dressing technique.
Eisenberg PG; Howard MP; Gianino MS
J Intraven Nurs; 1990; 13(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 2401932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Less frequent catheter dressing changes decrease local cutaneous toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy in children, without increasing the rate of catheter-related infections: results of a randomised trial.
Benhamou E; Fessard E; Com-Nougué C; Beaussier PS; Nitenberg G; Tancrède C; Dodeman S; Hartmann O
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2002 Apr; 29(8):653-8. PubMed ID: 12180109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access.
Raad I; Davis S; Becker M; Hohn D; Houston D; Umphrey J; Bodey GP
Arch Intern Med; 1993 Aug; 153(15):1791-6. PubMed ID: 8392831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Frequency of change of dressings. 2 comparative trials with central venous catheters in children, hospitalized for severe chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation].
Fessard E
Soins; 1994; (585-586):33-8. PubMed ID: 7939877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of different sterile barrier precautions and central venous catheter dressing on the skin colonization around the insertion site.
Carrer S; Bocchi A; Bortolotti M; Braga N; Gilli G; Candini M; Tartari S
Minerva Anestesiol; 2005 May; 71(5):197-206. PubMed ID: 15834348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Percutaneous placement of femoral central venous catheter in patients undergoing transplantation of bone marrow.
Lazarus HM; Creger RJ; Bloom AD; Shenk R
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 May; 170(5):403-6. PubMed ID: 2183372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized study comparing IV 3000 (transparent polyurethane dressing) to a dry gauze dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter sites.
Madeo M; Martin C; Nobbs A
J Intraven Nurs; 1997; 20(5):253-6. PubMed ID: 9369626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transparent and gauze dressings and their effect on infection rates of central venous catheters: a review of past and current literature.
Lau CE
J Intraven Nurs; 1996; 19(5):240-5. PubMed ID: 9060348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a new hydrocolloid occlusive dressing for central catheters used in total parenteral nutrition.
Haffejee AA; Moodley J; Pillay K; Singh B; Thomson S; Bhamjee A
S Afr J Surg; 1991 Dec; 29(4):142-6. PubMed ID: 1763392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complications of indwelling central venous catheters in bone marrow transplant recipients.
Moosa HH; Julian TB; Rosenfeld CS; Shadduck RK
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Apr; 172(4):275-9. PubMed ID: 2006451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of occlusive and conventional gauze dressings on incisional healing after abdominal operations.
Holm C; Petersen JS; Grønboek F; Gottrup F
Eur J Surg; 1998 Mar; 164(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 9562277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of gauze versus transparent dressings for peripheral intravenous catheter sites.
Pettit DM; Kraus V
Nurs Clin North Am; 1995 Sep; 30(3):495-506. PubMed ID: 7567574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of transparent polyurethane and dry gauze dressings for peripheral i.v. catheter sites: rates of phlebitis, infiltration, and dislodgment by patients.
Tripepi-Bova KA; Woods KD; Loach MC
Am J Crit Care; 1997 Sep; 6(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 9283675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of occlusive dressings on central venous catheter sites in hospitalized children.
Taylor D; Myers ST; Monarch K; Leon C; Hall J; Sibley Y
J Pediatr Nurs; 1996 Jun; 11(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 8667154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
