These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17630252)
1. The validity of a computer-assisted simulation system for orthognathic surgery (CASSOS) for planning the surgical correction of class III skeletal deformities: single-jaw versus bimaxillary surgery. Jones RM; Khambay BS; McHugh S; Ayoub AF Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 36(10):900-8. PubMed ID: 17630252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictability of soft tissue profile changes following bimaxillary surgery in skeletal class III Chinese patients. Koh CH; Chew MT J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Dec; 62(12):1505-9. PubMed ID: 15573350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients. Choi JW; Lee JY; Oh TS; Kwon SM; Yang SJ; Koh KS J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23870714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients. Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-Aided Freehand Maxillary Repositioning. Lin X; Sun Y; Han X; Wang J; Zhang M; Liang L J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):175-177. PubMed ID: 29286996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Late growth period orthopedic therapy versus bimaxillary surgery for correction of skeletal class III. Gokalp H; Güney V; Kurt G J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):741-7. PubMed ID: 20485039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of single- or double-jaw surgery on vertical dimension in skeletal Class III patients. Enacar A; Taner T; Manav O Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11563393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Chinese Class III patients. Chew MT Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):959-63. PubMed ID: 16448238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of Dolphin visual treatment objective (VTO) prediction software on class III patients treated with maxillary advancement and mandibular setback. Peterman RJ; Jiang S; Johe R; Mukherjee PM Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):19. PubMed ID: 27312722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The validity of using profile predictions for class III patients planned for bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Franks SL; Bakshi A; Khambay BS Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 May; 60(4):507-512. PubMed ID: 35346522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery? Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skeletal stability and morbidity with self-reinforced P (L/DL) LA resorbable osteosynthesis in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Moure C; Qassemyar Q; Dunaud O; Neiva C; Testelin S; Devauchelle B J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 40(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 21514172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system. Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Satisfaction with orthognathic surgery of skeletal Class III patients. Asada K; Motoyoshi M; Tamura T; Nakajima A; Mayahara K; Shimizu N Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Nov; 148(5):827-37. PubMed ID: 26522044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of pharyngeal airway space changes after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with a 3-dimensional simulation and modeling program. Gokce SM; Gorgulu S; Gokce HS; Bengi AO; Karacayli U; Ors F Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Oct; 146(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 25263151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of 2 software programs for predicting profile changes in Class III patients having double-jaw orthognathic surgery. Magro-Filho O; Magro-Ernica N; Queiroz TP; Aranega AM; Garcia IR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):452.e1-5; discussion 452-3. PubMed ID: 20362896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stability of maxillary advancement for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: preliminary results of an active control equivalence trial for semirigid and rigid fixation of the maxilla. Politi M; Costa F; Robiony M; Soldano F; Isola M Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(2):98-110. PubMed ID: 12099322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Soft tissue thickness changes after correcting Class III malocclusion with bimaxillar surgery. Abeltins A; Jakobsone G Stomatologija; 2011; 13(3):87-91. PubMed ID: 22071416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of maxillary advancement and impaction on the upper airway after bimaxillary surgery to correct Class III malocclusion. Jakobsone G; Stenvik A; Espeland L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4 Suppl):e369-76. PubMed ID: 21435545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]