573 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17630357)
21. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessment of left ventricular outflow tract geometry in non-stenotic and stenotic aortic valves by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Burgstahler C; Kunze M; Löffler C; Gawaz MP; Hombach V; Merkle N
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2006; 8(6):825-9. PubMed ID: 17060105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging of aortic valve stenosis and aortic root to multimodality imaging for selection of transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates.
Paelinck BP; Van Herck PL; Rodrigus I; Claeys MJ; Laborde JC; Parizel PM; Vrints CJ; Bosmans JM
Am J Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 108(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 21529729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area.
Feuchtner GM; Müller S; Bonatti J; Schachner T; Velik-Salchner C; Pachinger O; Dichtl W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):197-203. PubMed ID: 17579171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Grading Aortic Stenosis With Mean Gradient and Aortic Valve Area: A Comparison Between Preoperative Transthoracic and Precardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography.
Whitener G; Sivak J; Akushevich I; Samad Z; Swaminathan M
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1254-9. PubMed ID: 27495962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Planimetry of the Orifice Area in Aortic Valve Stenosis Using Phase-Contrast Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Abe H; Iguchi N; Utanohara Y; Takada K; Hen Y; Machida H; Takeda N; Sumiyoshi T
Int Heart J; 2018 Jan; 59(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 29279525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of echocardiographic and electron beam computed tomographic assessment of aortic valve area in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.
Piers LH; Dikkers R; Tio RA; van den Berg MP; Willems TP; Zijlstra F; Oudkerk M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2007 Dec; 23(6):781-8. PubMed ID: 17285263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Grading of aortic stenosis severity: a head-to-head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography.
Mantini C; Di Giammarco G; Pizzicannella J; Gallina S; Ricci F; D'Ugo E; Marchetti M; Cotroneo AR; Ahmed N; Bucciarelli-Ducci C; Tartaro A; De Caterina R
Radiol Med; 2018 Sep; 123(9):643-654. PubMed ID: 29730841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Three-dimensional surface area of the aortic valve orifice by three-dimensional echocardiography: clinical validation of a novel index for assessment of aortic stenosis.
Ge S; Warner JG; Abraham TP; Kon ND; Brooker RF; Nomeir AM; Fowle KM; Burgess P; Kitzman DW
Am Heart J; 1998 Dec; 136(6):1042-50. PubMed ID: 9842018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Tanaka K; Makaryus AN; Wolff SD
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 17891618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of ejection fraction and valvular regurgitation on the accuracy of aortic valve area determination.
Berglund H; Kim CJ; Nishioka T; Luo H; Siegel RJ
Echocardiography; 2001 Jan; 18(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11182785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Grading of aortic valve stenosis at 64-slice spiral computed tomography: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography and calibration against cardiac catheterization.
Lembcke A; Woinke M; Borges AC; Dohmen PM; Lachnitt A; Westermann Y; Geigenmueller A; Hermann KG; Butler C; Thiele H; Kivelitz DE
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jun; 44(6):360-8. PubMed ID: 19412115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of 64-slice computed tomography planimetry and Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of aortic valve stenosis.
Habis M; Daoud B; Roger VL; Ghostine S; Caussin C; Ramadan R; Nottin R; Lancelin B; Angel CY; Capderou A; Paul JF
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 May; 16(3):216-24. PubMed ID: 17578038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of aortic valve area measured by magnetic resonance imaging and dual-source computed tomography.
Bruder O; Jochims M; Hunold P; Jensen C; Forsting M; Sabin GV; Barkhausen J; Schlosser T
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):645-51. PubMed ID: 19452337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A New Method for Aortic Valve Planimetry with High-Resolution 3-Dimensional MRI and Its Comparison with Conventional Cine MRI and Echocardiography for Assessing the Severity of Aortic Valvular Stenosis.
Kim HJ; Choe YH; Kim SM; Kim EK; Lee M; Park SJ; Ahn J; Carriere KC
Korean J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 22(8):1266-1278. PubMed ID: 33938648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantitation of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis with multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: comparison with monoplane transesophageal approach.
Tribouilloy C; Shen WF; Peltier M; Mirode A; Rey JL; Lesbre JP
Am Heart J; 1994 Sep; 128(3):526-32. PubMed ID: 8074015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of aortic stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography: an accurate and novel approach.
Goland S; Trento A; Iida K; Czer LS; De Robertis M; Naqvi TZ; Tolstrup K; Akima T; Luo H; Siegel RJ
Heart; 2007 Jul; 93(7):801-7. PubMed ID: 17488766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A simplified continuity equation approach to the quantification of stenotic bicuspid aortic valves using velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Yap SC; van Geuns RJ; Meijboom FJ; Kirschbaum SW; McGhie JS; Simoons ML; Kilner PJ; Roos-Hesselink JW
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(6):899-906. PubMed ID: 18066750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques.
Kupfahl C; Honold M; Meinhardt G; Vogelsberg H; Wagner A; Mahrholdt H; Sechtem U
Heart; 2004 Aug; 90(8):893-901. PubMed ID: 15253962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Value of anatomical aortic valve area using real-time three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis: a comparison between tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves.
Machida T; Izumo M; Suzuki K; Yoneyama K; Kamijima R; Mizukoshi K; Takai M; Kobayashi Y; Harada T; Miyake F; Ohtaki E; Nobuoka S; Matsumoto N; Akashi YJ
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Oct; 16(10):1120-8. PubMed ID: 25762561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
