BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17630622)

  • 1. Extraction efficiency of an extraction buffer used to quantify lysozyme deposition on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials.
    Subbaraman LN; Glasier MA; Senchyna M; Sheardown H; Jones L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Jul; 33(4):169-73. PubMed ID: 17630622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model.
    Suwala M; Glasier MA; Subbaraman LN; Jones L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 May; 33(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 17502748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro deposition of lysozyme on etafilcon A and balafilcon A hydrogel contact lenses: effects on adhesion and survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.
    Zhang S; Borazjani RN; Salamone JC; Ahearn DG; Crow SA; Pierce GE
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2005 Sep; 28(3):113-9. PubMed ID: 16318841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wettability of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in the presence of tear-film components.
    Cheng L; Muller SJ; Radke CJ
    Curr Eye Res; 2004 Feb; 28(2):93-108. PubMed ID: 14972715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro assessment of medical device toxicity: interactions of benzalkonium chloride with silicone-containing and p-hema-containing hydrogel contact lens materials.
    Dracopoulos A; Dixon DG; Jones LW; Sivak JG; Bantseev V
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Jan; 33(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 17224676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials.
    Senchyna M; Jones L; Louie D; May C; Forbes I; Glasier MA
    Curr Eye Res; 2004 Jan; 28(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 14704911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials.
    Subbaraman LN; Glasier MA; Senchyna M; Sheardown H; Jones L
    Curr Eye Res; 2006 Oct; 31(10):787-96. PubMed ID: 17050272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro water wettability of silicone hydrogel contact lenses determined using the sessile drop and captive bubble techniques.
    Maldonado-Codina C; Morgan PB
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Nov; 83(2):496-502. PubMed ID: 17503532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses for bullous keratoplasty.
    Lim N; Vogt U
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Sep; 32(5):250-3. PubMed ID: 16974160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultraviolet (UV) transmittance characteristics of daily disposable and silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Moore L; Ferreira JT
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2006 Jul; 29(3):115-22. PubMed ID: 16697696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stabilization of lysozyme mass extracted from lotrafilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Subbaraman LN; Glasier MA; Senchyna M; Jones L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Mar; 82(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 15767876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-term physiologic response in neophyte subjects fitted with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Maldonado-Codina C; Morgan PB; Schnider CM; Efron N
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 81(12):911-21. PubMed ID: 15592115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Santos L; Rodrigues D; Lira M; Oliveira ME; Oliveira R; Vilar EY; Azeredo J
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Jul; 30(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 17291818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing goblet cell densities in patients wearing disposable hydrogel contact lenses versus silicone hydrogel contact lenses in an extended-wear modality.
    Lievens CW; Connor CG; Murphy H
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Oct; 29(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 14555901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses.
    Garrett Q; Garrett RW; Milthorpe BK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Apr; 40(5):897-903. PubMed ID: 10102286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oxygen permeability and water content of silicone hydrogel contact lens materials.
    Efron N; Morgan PB; Cameron ID; Brennan NA; Goodwin M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 84(4):328-37. PubMed ID: 17435503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial comfort of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lenses versus etafilcon A contact lenses for extended wear.
    Martin R; de Juan V; Rodriguez G; Martin S; Fonseca S
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17178252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials.
    Jones L; Senchyna M; Glasier MA; Schickler J; Forbes I; Louie D; May C
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jan; 29(1 Suppl):S75-9; discussion S83-4, S192-4. PubMed ID: 12772737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lysozyme penetration in group IV soft contact lenses.
    Okada E; Matsuda T; Yokoyama T; Okuda K
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Jul; 32(4):174-7. PubMed ID: 16845262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attachment of Acanthamoeba to first- and second-generation silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Beattie TK; Tomlinson A; McFadyen AK
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jan; 113(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 16360208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.