804 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17631021)
1. Limitations of cyclosporine C2 monitoring in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
Hmiel SP; Canter C; Shepherd R; Lassa-Claxton S; Nadler M
Pediatr Transplant; 2007 Aug; 11(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 17631021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of measured trough levels and abbreviated AUC estimation by limited sampling strategies for monitoring mycophenolic acid exposure in stable heart transplant patients receiving cyclosporin A-containing and cyclosporin A-free immunosuppressive regimens.
Dösch AO; Ehlermann P; Koch A; Remppis A; Katus HA; Dengler TJ
Clin Ther; 2006 Jun; 28(6):893-905. PubMed ID: 16860172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cyclosporine monitoring in the early post-transplant period in pediatric liver transplant recipients.
Frauca E; Diaz MC; de la Vega A; Hierro L; Camarena C; Muñoz Bartolo G; Díez R; Murcia J; Gámez M; Sanchez Peinado C; López Santamaría M; Andrés I; Jara P
Pediatr Transplant; 2007 Aug; 11(5):530-5. PubMed ID: 17631022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of cyclosporine concentrations 2 hours post-dose determined using 3 different methods and trough level in pediatric renal transplantation.
Rodríguez E; Delucchi MA; Cano F; Valdebenito S; Castillo MC; Villegas R
Transplant Proc; 2005 Oct; 37(8):3354-7. PubMed ID: 16298594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of late conversion from C0 to C2 monitoring of microemulsified cyclosporine in pediatric living donor liver transplant recipients.
Takatsuki M; Chen CL; Chen YS; Wang CC; Lin CC; Yang CH; Yong CC; Liu YW
Clin Transplant; 2004 Dec; 18(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 15516246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advantages of C2 monitoring to avoid acute rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
Schubert S; Abdul-Khaliq H; Lehmkuhl HB; Hübler M; Abd El Rahman MY; Miera O; Ewert P; Weng Y; Wei H; Krüdewagen B; Hetzer R; Berger F
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2006 Jun; 25(6):619-25. PubMed ID: 16730566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evolution of the absorption profile of cyclosporine A in renal transplant recipients: a longitudinal study of the de novo and maintenance phases.
Büchler M; Chadban S; Cole E; Midtvedt K; Thervet E; Prestele H; Keown P
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Jan; 21(1):197-202. PubMed ID: 16204301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cyclosporine profiling with C2 and C0 monitoring improves outcomes after heart transplantation.
Barnard JB; Thekkudan J; Richardson S; Bittar MN; Martyszczuck R; Hasan J; Khasati N; Keevil B; Yonan N
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2006 May; 25(5):564-8. PubMed ID: 16678036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized, controlled trial of C0- Vs C2-guided therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine in stable heart transplant patients.
Mathias HC; Ozalp F; Will MB; Borland W; Payne C; Kerr M; Lockhart J; Murday AJ
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Dec; 24(12):2137-43. PubMed ID: 16364862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cyclosporine C2 levels have impact on incidence of rejection in de novo lung but not heart transplant recipients: the NOCTURNE study.
Iversen M; Nilsson F; Sipponen J; Eiskjaer H; Mared L; Bergan S; Nyström U; Fagertun HE; Solbu D; Simonsen S
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2009 Sep; 28(9):919-26. PubMed ID: 19716045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association between cyclosporine concentrations at 2 hours post-dose and clinical outcomes in de novo lung transplant recipients.
Akhlaghi F; Gonzalez L; Trull AK
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Dec; 24(12):2120-8. PubMed ID: 16364860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-hour cyclosporine level determination is the appropriate tool to monitor Neoral therapy.
Cantarovich M; Besner JG; Barkun JS; Elstein E; Loertscher R
Clin Transplant; 1998 Jun; 12(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 9642517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters to facilitate conversion from C0 to C2 monitoring in heart transplant recipients.
Davies RA; Veinot JP; Williams K; Haddad H; Baker A; Donaldson J; Pugliese C; Struthers C; Masters RG; Hendry PJ; Mesana T
Transplant Proc; 2007 Dec; 39(10):3334-9. PubMed ID: 18089382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. C2 is superior to C0 as predictor of renal toxicity and rejection risk profile in stable heart transplant recipients.
Caforio AL; Tona F; Piaserico S; Gambino A; Feltrin G; Fortina AB; Angelini A; Alaibac M; Bontorin M; Calzolari D; Peserico A; Thiene G; Iliceto S; Gerosa G
Transpl Int; 2005 Jan; 18(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 15612993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single time point measurement by C2 or C3 is highly predictive in cyclosporine area under the curve estimation immediately after lung transplantation.
Hangler HB; Ruttmann E; Geltner C; Bucher B; Nagiller J; Laufer G; Mueller LC
Clin Transplant; 2008; 22(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 18217903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in renal transplant recipients under treatment with cyclosporine and Myfortic.
Brunet M; Crespo M; Millán O; Serón D; Torregrosa V; Jiménez O; Moreso F; Martorell J; Grinyo JM; Oppenheimer F
Transplant Proc; 2007 Sep; 39(7):2160-2. PubMed ID: 17889124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcomes and C2 cyclosporin monitoring in maintenance renal transplant recipients: 1 year follow-up study.
Marcén R; Villafruela JJ; Pascual J; Teruel JL; Ocaña J; Tenorio MT; Burgos FJ; Ortuño J
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2005 Apr; 20(4):803-10. PubMed ID: 15687111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical outcomes during the first three months posttransplant in renal allograft recipients managed by C2 monitoring of cyclosporine microemulsion.
Thervet E; Pfeffer P; Scolari MP; Toselli L; Pallardó LM; Chadban S; Pilmore H; Connolly J; Buchler M; Schena FP; Carreño CA; Dandavino R; Cole E
Transplantation; 2003 Sep; 76(6):903-8. PubMed ID: 14508352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immunosuppressive drug monitoring of sirolimus and cyclosporine in pediatric patients.
Oellerich M; Armstrong VW; Streit F; Weber L; Tönshoff B
Clin Biochem; 2004 Jun; 37(6):424-8. PubMed ID: 15183289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A comparative randomized prospective multicenter study of Sandimmune vs Neoral in liver transplantation].
Roy A; Grant DR; Kneteman NM; Tchervenkov JI; Levy GA; Tan A; Hendricks L
Ann Chir; 1998; 52(8):716-21. PubMed ID: 9846420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
