153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17631290)
1. A possible approach for setting a mercury risk-based action level based on tribal fish ingestion rates.
Harper BL; Harris SG
Environ Res; 2008 May; 107(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 17631290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exposure assessment and initial intervention regarding fish consumption of tribal members of the Upper Great Lakes Region in the United States.
Dellinger JA
Environ Res; 2004 Jul; 95(3):325-40. PubMed ID: 15220067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An examination of the trade-offs in public health resulting from the use of default exposure assumptions in fish consumption advisories.
Mariën K; Stern AH
Environ Res; 2005 Jun; 98(2):258-67. PubMed ID: 15820733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of sport-fish consumption advisories in mercury risk communication: a 1998-1999 12-state survey of women age 18-45.
Anderson HA; Hanrahan LP; Smith A; Draheim L; Kanarek M; Olsen J
Environ Res; 2004 Jul; 95(3):315-24. PubMed ID: 15220066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Issues in evaluating fish consumption rates for Native American tribes.
Donatuto J; Harper BL
Risk Anal; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1497-506. PubMed ID: 18793286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mercury levels and potential risk from subsistence foods from the Aleutians.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Jeitner C; Burke S; Stamm T; Snigaroff R; Snigaroff D; Patrick R; Weston J
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Oct; 384(1-3):93-105. PubMed ID: 17590413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of risk-based, culturally sensitive Ogaa (walleye) consumption advice for Anishinaabe tribal members in the Great Lakes Region.
DeWeese AD; Kmiecik NE; Chiriboga ED; Foran JA
Risk Anal; 2009 May; 29(5):729-42. PubMed ID: 19220800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mercury in canned tuna: white versus light and temporal variation.
Burger J; Gochfeld M
Environ Res; 2004 Nov; 96(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 15364590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ranking the contributions of commercial fish and shellfish varieties to mercury exposure in the United States: implications for risk communication.
Groth E
Environ Res; 2010 Apr; 110(3):226-36. PubMed ID: 20116785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consideration of cultural and lifestyle factors in defining susceptible populations for environmental disease.
Judd NL; Griffith WC; Faustman EM
Toxicology; 2004 May; 198(1-3):121-33. PubMed ID: 15138036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fish consumption, fish lore, and mercury pollution--risk communication for the Madeira River people.
Boischio AA; Henshel D
Environ Res; 2000 Oct; 84(2):108-26. PubMed ID: 11068924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lifestyles, diets, and Native American exposure factors related to possible lead exposures and toxicity.
Harris S; Harper BL
Environ Res; 2001 Jun; 86(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 11437460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A framework and information needs for the management of the risks from consumption of self-caught fish.
Burger J; Gochfeld M
Environ Res; 2006 Jun; 101(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 16386241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mercury content in commercial pelagic fish and its risk assessment in the Western Indian Ocean.
Kojadinovic J; Potier M; Le Corre M; Cosson RP; Bustamante P
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Aug; 366(2-3):688-700. PubMed ID: 16580709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mercury advisories and household health trade-offs.
Shimshack JP; Ward MB
J Health Econ; 2010 Sep; 29(5):674-85. PubMed ID: 20609487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contaminated fish consumption in California's Central Valley Delta.
Shilling F; White A; Lippert L; Lubell M
Environ Res; 2010 May; 110(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 20176346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimates of fish consumption rates for consumers of bought and self-caught fish in Connecticut, Florida, Minnesota, and North Dakota.
Moya J; Itkin C; Selevan SG; Rogers JW; Clickner RP
Sci Total Environ; 2008 Sep; 403(1-3):89-98. PubMed ID: 18579180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mercury in fish available in supermarkets in Illinois: are there regional differences.
Burger J; Gochfeld M
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Aug; 367(2-3):1010-6. PubMed ID: 16815532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mercury levels and fish consumption practices in women of child-bearing age in the Florida Panhandle.
Karouna-Renier NK; Ranga Rao K; Lanza JJ; Rivers SD; Wilson PA; Hodges DK; Levine KE; Ross GT
Environ Res; 2008 Nov; 108(3):320-6. PubMed ID: 18814872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
