404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17631378)
1. Solute transport model for trace organic neutral and charged compounds through nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Kim TU; Drewes JE; Scott Summers R; Amy GL
Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3977-88. PubMed ID: 17631378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rejection of trace organic compounds by high-pressure membranes.
Kim TU; Amy G; Drewes JE
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):335-44. PubMed ID: 16003994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis.
Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2683-92. PubMed ID: 22402269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Viability of a low-pressure nanofilter in treating recycled water for water reuse applications: a pilot-scale study.
Bellona C; Drewes JE
Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3948-58. PubMed ID: 17582458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transport of target anions, chromate (Cr (VI)), arsenate (As (V)), and perchlorate (ClO4-), through RO, NF, and UF membranes.
Yoon J; Amy G; Yoon Y
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):327-34. PubMed ID: 16003993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes.
Yoon J; Amy G; Chung J; Sohn J; Yoon Y
Chemosphere; 2009 Sep; 77(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 19679331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes.
Kimura K; Iwase T; Kita S; Watanabe Y
Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3751-8. PubMed ID: 19564034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling the effect of charge density in the active layers of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes on the rejection of arsenic(III) and potassium iodide.
Coronell O; Mi B; Mariñas BJ; Cahill DG
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(1):420-8. PubMed ID: 23199291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of water matrix on the rejection of neutral pharmaceutically active compound by thin-film composite nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Shah IA; Ali S; Yang Z; Ihsanullah I; Huang H
Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135211. PubMed ID: 35660049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distillery wastewater treatment by the membrane-based nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes.
Nataraj SK; Hosamani KM; Aminabhavi TM
Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2349-56. PubMed ID: 16757012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of tertiary treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for water reuse in denim textile industry.
Ben Amar N; Kechaou N; Palmeri J; Deratani A; Sghaier A
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Oct; 170(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 19497667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Removal of organic contaminants by RO and NF membranes.
Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
J Memb Sci; 2005 Sep; 261(1-2):76-86. PubMed ID: 16134262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reverse osmosis membrane rejection for ersatz space mission wastewaters.
Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3298-308. PubMed ID: 16005043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the impacts of membrane type, coating, fouling, chemical properties and water chemistry on reverse osmosis rejection of seven nitrosoalklyamines, including NDMA.
Steinle-Darling E; Zedda M; Plumlee MH; Ridgway HF; Reinhard M
Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3959-67. PubMed ID: 17582457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of natural organic matter and cations on the rejection of endocrine disrupting and pharmaceutically active compounds by nanofiltration.
Comerton AM; Andrews RC; Bagley DM
Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):613-22. PubMed ID: 19046596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osmotic, diffusive and convective volume and solute flows of ionic solutions through a horizontally mounted polymeric membrane.
Jasik-Slezak J; Grzegorczyn S; Slezak A
Polim Med; 2007; 37(3):31-46. PubMed ID: 18251203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comprehensive bench- and pilot-scale investigation of trace organic compounds rejection by forward osmosis.
Hancock NT; Xu P; Heil DM; Bellona C; Cath TY
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(19):8483-90. PubMed ID: 21838294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
