These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Farmer TA; Christiansen MH; Monaghan P Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Aug; 103(32):12203-8. PubMed ID: 16882728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Altarriba J; Kroll JF; Sholl A; Rayner K Mem Cognit; 1996 Jul; 24(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 8757496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Category norm data and relationships with lexical frequency and typicality within verb semantic categories. Plant C; Webster J; Whitworth A Behav Res Methods; 2011 Jun; 43(2):424-40. PubMed ID: 21298568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are French Fries a Vegetable? Lexical Typicality Judgement Differences in Deaf and Hearing Learners. Crowe K; Marschark M J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Dec; 48(6):1319-1338. PubMed ID: 31399872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Taxonomic and ad hoc categorization within the two cerebral hemispheres. Shen Y; Aharoni BE; Mashal N Laterality; 2015; 20(5):517-29. PubMed ID: 25644310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scope of lexical access in spoken sentence production: implications for the conceptual-syntactic interface. Allum PH; Wheeldon L J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1240-55. PubMed ID: 19686018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic mental representations in language comprehension. Qu C; Luo YJ; Mo L Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Jun; 108(3):933-48. PubMed ID: 19725327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conceptual accessibility and sentence production in a free word order language (Odawa). Christianson K; Ferreira F Cognition; 2005 Dec; 98(2):105-35. PubMed ID: 16307955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Category structure and created memories. Smith SM; Ward TB; Tindell DR; Sifonis CM; Wilkenfeld MJ Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):386-95. PubMed ID: 10881556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantifying the internal structure of categories using a neural typicality measure. Davis T; Poldrack RA Cereb Cortex; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1720-37. PubMed ID: 23442348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Word and world order: semantic, phonological, and metrical determinants of serial position. McDonald JL; Bock K; Kelly MH Cogn Psychol; 1993 Apr; 25(2):188-230. PubMed ID: 8482072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spanish norms for age of acquisition, concept familiarity, lexical frequency, manipulability, typicality, and other variables for 820 words from 14 living/nonliving concepts. Moreno-MartÃnez FJ; Montoro PR; RodrÃguez-Rojo IC Behav Res Methods; 2014 Dec; 46(4):1088-97. PubMed ID: 24415408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The sentence-composition effect: processing of complex sentences depends on the configuration of common noun phrases versus unusual noun phrases. Johnson ML; Lowder MW; Gordon PC J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):707-24. PubMed ID: 21767046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeating words in sentences: effects of sentence structure. Wheeldon LR; Smith MC; Apperly IA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1051-64. PubMed ID: 21517223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension. Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1859-69. PubMed ID: 21925613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of semantic and morphological complexity of verbs on sentence recall: Implications for the nature of conceptual representation and category-specific deficits. Mobayyen F; de Almeida RG Brain Cogn; 2005 Mar; 57(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 15708211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]