271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17632030)
1. Dielectric elastomers as actuators for upper limb prosthetics: challenges and opportunities.
Biddiss E; Chau T
Med Eng Phys; 2008 May; 30(4):403-18. PubMed ID: 17632030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical application study of externally powered upper-limb prosthetics systems: the VA elbow, the VA hand, and the VA/NU myoelectric hand systems.
Lewis EA; Sheredos CR; Sowell TT; Houston VL
Bull Prosthet Res; 1975; (10-24):51-136. PubMed ID: 776301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Update on advances in upper extremity prosthetics.
Behrend C; Reizner W; Marchessault JA; Hammert WC
J Hand Surg Am; 2011 Oct; 36(10):1711-7. PubMed ID: 21971060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advanced upper limb prosthetic devices: implications for upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation.
Resnik L; Meucci MR; Lieberman-Klinger S; Fantini C; Kelty DL; Disla R; Sasson N
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Apr; 93(4):710-7. PubMed ID: 22464092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of an adjustable electrode housing unit to compare electrode alignment and contact variation with myoelectric prosthesis functionality: A pilot study.
Head JS; Howard D; Hutchins SW; Kenney L; Heath GH; Aksenov AY
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 25134531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review.
Carey SL; Lura DJ; Highsmith MJ; ;
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(3):247-62. PubMed ID: 26230500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural interfaces for control of upper limb prostheses: the state of the art and future possibilities.
Schultz AE; Kuiken TA
PM R; 2011 Jan; 3(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 21257135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of body-powered upper limb prostheses by able-bodied subjects, using the Box and Blocks Test and the Nine-Hole Peg Test.
Haverkate L; Smit G; Plettenburg DH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 25336050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years.
Biddiss EA; Chau TT
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Sep; 31(3):236-57. PubMed ID: 17979010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of novel 3D-printed robotic prosthetic for transradial amputees.
Gretsch KF; Lather HD; Peddada KV; Deeken CR; Wall LB; Goldfarb CA
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Jun; 40(3):400-3. PubMed ID: 25934422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of upper limb prostheses: current progress and areas for growth.
González-Fernández M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 95(6):1013-4. PubMed ID: 24361817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics.
Antfolk C; D'Alonzo M; Rosén B; Lundborg G; Sebelius F; Cipriani C
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2013 Jan; 10(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 23278223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Jaipur foot.
Arya AP; Klenerman L
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Nov; 90(11):1414-6. PubMed ID: 18978257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electroactive polymeric sensors in hand prostheses: bending response of an ionic polymer metal composite.
Biddiss E; Chau T
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16260170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Progressive upper limb prosthetics.
Lake C; Dodson R
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2006 Feb; 17(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 16517345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Active lower limb prosthetics: a systematic review of design issues and solutions.
Windrich M; Grimmer M; Christ O; Rinderknecht S; Beckerle P
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 3):140. PubMed ID: 28105948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Tests of hand functionality in upper limb amputation with prosthesis].
Bazzini G; Orlandini D; Moscato TA; Nicita D; Panigazzi M
G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2007; 29(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 17886763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Controlling a multi-degree of freedom upper limb prosthesis using foot controls: user experience.
Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K; Fantini C
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 23902465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differential experiences of embodiment between body-powered and myoelectric prosthesis users.
Engdahl SM; Meehan SK; Gates DH
Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15471. PubMed ID: 32963290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and precision of volumetric determinations using two commercial CAD systems for prosthetics: a technical note.
Johansson S; Oberg T
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jan; 35(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 9505250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
