BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17632139)

  • 1. Shock wave lithotripsy correlates with stone density on preoperative computerized tomography.
    Perks AE; Gotto G; Teichman JM
    J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):912-5. PubMed ID: 17632139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hounsfield units on computerized tomography predict stone-free rates after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Pareek G; Armenakas NA; Fracchia JA
    J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1679-81. PubMed ID: 12686807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy.
    Perks AE; Schuler TD; Lee J; Ghiculete D; Chung DG; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
    Urology; 2008 Oct; 72(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 18674803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of renal anatomy on shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole kidney stones: results of a prospective multifactorial analysis controlled by computerized tomography.
    Torricelli FC; Marchini GS; Yamauchi FI; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Srougi M; Monga M; Mazzucchi E
    J Urol; 2015 Jun; 193(6):2002-7. PubMed ID: 25524240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographic parameters on noncontrast computerized tomography predictive of shock wave lithotripsy success.
    Kacker R; Zhao L; Macejko A; Thaxton CS; Stern J; Liu JJ; Nadler RB
    J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1866-71. PubMed ID: 18353389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Value of Hounsfield unit on CT in prediction of stone-free rate of upper urinary calculi after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy].
    Cheng G; Xie LP; Li XY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 86(4):276-8. PubMed ID: 16677510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a scoring system from noncontrast computerized tomography measurements to improve the selection of upper ureteral stone for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Ng CF; Siu DY; Wong A; Goggins W; Chan ES; Wong KT
    J Urol; 2009 Mar; 181(3):1151-7. PubMed ID: 19152949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.
    Ouzaid I; Al-qahtani S; Dominique S; Hupertan V; Fernandez P; Hermieu JF; Delmas V; Ravery V
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E438-42. PubMed ID: 22372937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shock wave lithotripsy success for renal stones based on patient and stone computed tomography characteristics.
    Weld KJ; Montiglio C; Morris MS; Bush AC; Cespedes RD
    Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1043-6; discussion 1046-7. PubMed ID: 18158009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective randomized comparative study of the effectiveness and safety of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic extracorporeal shock wave lithotriptors.
    Sheir KZ; Madbouly K; Elsobky E
    J Urol; 2003 Aug; 170(2 Pt 1):389-92. PubMed ID: 12853782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multidetector computed tomography: role in determination of urinary stones composition and disintegration with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy--an in vitro study.
    el-Assmy A; Abou-el-Ghar ME; el-Nahas AR; Refaie HF; Sheir KZ
    Urology; 2011 Feb; 77(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 20719366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. University of Wisconsin experience using the Doli S lithotriptor.
    Johnson DB; Lowry PS; Schluckebier JA; Kryger JV; Nakada SY
    Urology; 2003 Sep; 62(3):410-4; discussion 414-5. PubMed ID: 12946735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.
    Pareek G; Hedican SP; Lee FT; Nakada SY
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):941-4. PubMed ID: 16286099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low success rate of repeat shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones after failed initial treatment.
    Pace KT; Weir MJ; Tariq N; Honey RJ
    J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):1905-7. PubMed ID: 11061877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive factors of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for urinary stones.
    Ben Khalifa B; Naouar S; Gazzah W; Salem B; El Kamel R
    Tunis Med; 2016 May; 94(5):397-400. PubMed ID: 27801492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success based on body mass index and Hounsfield units.
    Pareek G; Armenakas NA; Panagopoulos G; Bruno JJ; Fracchia JA
    Urology; 2005 Jan; 65(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 15667858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for upper urinary tract stones using the Dornier lithotriptor MFL5000].
    Fujimoto N; Kyo M; Ichikawa Y; Nagano S
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1994 Dec; 40(12):1069-75. PubMed ID: 7863858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Bandi G; Meiners RJ; Pickhardt PJ; Nakada SY
    BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(4):524-8. PubMed ID: 19007365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is lower pole caliceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones?
    Sorensen CM; Chandhoke PS
    J Urol; 2002 Dec; 168(6):2377-82; discussion 2382. PubMed ID: 12441921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is stone radiodensity a useful parameter for predicting outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for stones < or = 2 cm?
    Krishnamurthy MS; Ferucci PG; Sankey N; Chandhoke PS
    Int Braz J Urol; 2005; 31(1):3-8; discussion 9. PubMed ID: 15763001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.