809 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17632159)
1. A comparison of the Bricker versus Wallace ureteroileal anastomosis in patients undergoing urinary diversion for bladder cancer.
Kouba E; Sands M; Lentz A; Wallen E; Pruthi RS
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):945-8; discussion 948-9. PubMed ID: 17632159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technique selection of bricker or wallace ureteroileal anastomosis in ileal conduit urinary diversion: a strategy based on patient characteristics.
Liu L; Chen M; Li Y; Wang L; Qi F; Dun J; Chen J; Zu X; Qi L
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):2808-12. PubMed ID: 24590436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of ureterointestinal anastomosis: Wallace vs Bricker.
Evangelidis A; Lee EK; Karellas ME; Thrasher JB; Holzbeierlein JM
J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1755-8; discussion 1758. PubMed ID: 16600750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ureteroenteric strictures: a single center experience comparing Bricker versus Wallace ureteroileal anastomosis in patients after urinary diversion for bladder cancer.
Christoph F; Herrmann F; Werthemann P; Janik T; Schostak M; Klopf C; Weikert S
BMC Urol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):100. PubMed ID: 31651306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of modified Taguchi and Bricker ureteral reimplantation techniques after radical cystectomy.
Lee CT; Chen BT; Gong E; Hafez KS; Sheffield JH; Montie JE
Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):940-4. PubMed ID: 15533482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improvement of ureteroileal anastomosis in orthotopic ileal neobladder with modified le duc procedure: short submucosal tunnel technique.
Muraishi O; Yamashita T; Ishikawa S; Hara Y; Tokue A
J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):798-801. PubMed ID: 11176471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of running versus interrupted anastomosis on ureterointestinal stricture rate after radical cystectomy.
Large MC; Cohn JA; Kiriluk KJ; Dangle P; Richards KA; Smith ND; Steinberg GD
J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):923-7. PubMed ID: 23454159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybrid technique has lower stricture rates than Wallace and Bricker.
Can O; Danış E; Kutlutürk EG; Polat EC; Ötünçtemur A
Surg Oncol; 2024 Feb; 52():102036. PubMed ID: 38198985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperatively Dilated Ureters are a Specific Risk Factor for the Development of Ureteroenteric Strictures after Open Radical Cystectomy and Ileal Neobladder.
Hautmann RE; de Petriconi R; Kahlmeyer A; Enders M; Volkmer B
J Urol; 2017 Nov; 198(5):1098-1106. PubMed ID: 28536083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Open surgical repair of ureteral strictures and fistulas following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion.
Msezane L; Reynolds WS; Mhapsekar R; Gerber G; Steinberg G
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1428-31. PubMed ID: 18289599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Strategy in preventing of uretero-intestinal anastomosis strictures in patients with low-pressure intestinal neobladder].
Lipczyński W; Glazar B; Bak M; Dobrowolski ZF; Kusionowicz J
Przegl Lek; 2012; 69(5):181-3. PubMed ID: 23050413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Refluxing chimney versus nonrefluxing LeDuc ureteroileal anastomosis for orthotopic ileal neobladder: a comparative analysis for patients with bladder cancer.
Hautmann S; Chun KH; Currlin E; Braun P; Huland H; Juenemann KP
J Urol; 2006 Apr; 175(4):1389-93; discussion 1393-4. PubMed ID: 16516005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrosigmoid Versus Traditional Ileal Conduit for Urinary Diversion After Radical Cystectomy.
Ficarra V; Giannarini G; Crestani A; Palumbo V; Rossanese M; Valotto C; Inferrera A; Pansadoro V
Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 30091420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Use of double J ureteral stent as an alternative to prevent ureteroileal anastomosis stricture in orthotopic bladder substitution].
Echo H; Zerbib M; Saighi D; Amsellem-Ouazana D; Flam T; Debré B; Peyromaure M
Prog Urol; 2009 Feb; 19(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 19168018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A modified ureteroileal anastomosis technique for Bricker urinary diversion.
Li Y; Zhuang Q; Hu Z; Wang Z; Zhu H; Ye Z
Urology; 2011 Nov; 78(5):1191-5. PubMed ID: 21890180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of direct versus non-refluxing technique and functional results in orthotopic Y-ileal neobladder after 12 years of follow up.
Hassan AA; Elgamal SA; Sabaa MA; Salem KA; Elmateet MS
Int J Urol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):300-4. PubMed ID: 17470158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of Bricker versus Wallace ureteroenteric anastomosis and identification of predictors for postoperative ureteroenteric stricture.
Krafft U; Mahmoud O; Hess J; Radtke JP; Panic A; Püllen L; Darr C; Kesch C; Szarvas T; Rehme C; Hadaschik BA; Tschirdewahn S
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 May; 407(3):1233-1240. PubMed ID: 34940890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experience in 100 patients with an ileal low pressure bladder substitute combined with an afferent tubular isoperistaltic segment.
Studer UE; Danuser H; Merz VW; Springer JP; Zingg EJ
J Urol; 1995 Jul; 154(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 7776455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidence and risk factors of stomal complications in patients undergoing cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion for bladder cancer.
Kouba E; Sands M; Lentz A; Wallen E; Pruthi RS
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):950-4. PubMed ID: 17632147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bricker versus Wallace anastomosis: A meta-analysis of ureteroenteric stricture rates after ileal conduit urinary diversion.
Davis NF; Burke JP; McDermott T; Flynn R; Manecksha RP; Thornhill JA
Can Urol Assoc J; 2015; 9(5-6):E284-90. PubMed ID: 26029296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
