These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17632308)

  • 1. Cornea measurement comparison with Orbscan II and EyeSys videokeratoscope.
    Douthwaite WA; Mallen EA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):598-604. PubMed ID: 17632308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and precision of EyeSys and Orbscan systems on calibrated spherical test surfaces.
    González Pérez J; Cerviño A; Giraldez MJ; Parafita M; Yebra-Pimentel E
    Eye Contact Lens; 2004 Apr; 30(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 15260351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Corneal topography by keratometry.
    Douthwaite WA; Evardson WT
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2000 Aug; 84(8):842-7. PubMed ID: 10906088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of a videokeratoscope and an autokeratometer as predictors of the optimum back surface curves of rigid corneal contact lenses.
    Douthwaite W; Pardhan S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Sep; 17(5):409-13. PubMed ID: 9390367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of videokeratoscope and autokeratometer measurements on ellipsoid surfaces and human corneas.
    Pardhan S; Douthwaite WA
    J Refract Surg; 1998; 14(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 9699165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the EyeSys model II computerized videokeratoscope. Part II: The repeatability and accuracy in measuring convex aspheric surfaces.
    Dave T; Ruston D; Fowler C
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Sep; 75(9):656-62. PubMed ID: 9778698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of horizontal corneal diameter measurements using Galilei, EyeSys and Orbscan II systems.
    Salouti R; Nowroozzadeh MH; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Sep; 92(5):429-33. PubMed ID: 19681922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance in specular reflection and slit-imaging corneal topography.
    Braaf B; Dubbelman M; van der Heijde RG; Sicam VA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 May; 86(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 19342978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EyeSys corneal topography measurement applied to calibrated ellipsoidal convex surfaces.
    Douthwaite WA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1995 Sep; 79(9):797-801. PubMed ID: 7488595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of the inherent error in a spherically-biased corneal topography system in mapping a radially aspheric surface.
    Roberts C
    J Refract Corneal Surg; 1994; 10(2):103-11; discussion 112-6. PubMed ID: 7517283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Topographic paracentral corneal thickness with pentacam and orbscan: effect of acoustic factor.
    González-Pérez J; González-Méijome JM; Rodríguez Ares MT; Parafita MA
    Eye Contact Lens; 2011 Nov; 37(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 21983548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of corneal thickness on the agreement between ultrasound and Orbscan II pachymetry.
    Hashemi H; Roshani M; Mehravaran S; Parsafar H; Yazdani K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1694-700. PubMed ID: 17889762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface tilt measured with the EyeSys videokeratoscope: influence on corneal asymmetry.
    Douthwaite WA; Pardhan S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Aug; 39(9):1727-35. PubMed ID: 9699563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the EyeSys model II computerized videokeratoscope. Part I: Clinical assessment.
    Dave T; Ruston D; Fowler C
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Sep; 75(9):647-55. PubMed ID: 9778697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corneal topography with Scheimpflug imaging and videokeratography: comparative study of normal eyes.
    Read SA; Collins MJ; Iskander DR; Davis BA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1072-81. PubMed ID: 19465294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of Orbscan II slit-scanning elevation topography.
    Cairns G; McGhee CN; Collins MJ; Owens H; Gamble GD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Dec; 28(12):2181-7. PubMed ID: 12498857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of corneal tomography measurements using Galilei, Orbscan II, and Placido disk-based topographer systems.
    Karimian F; Feizi S; Doozandeh A; Faramarzi A; Yaseri M
    J Refract Surg; 2011 Jul; 27(7):502-8. PubMed ID: 21188959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repeatability and inter-device agreement for three different methods of keratometry: Placido, Scheimpflug, and color LED corneal topography.
    Hidalgo IR; Rozema JJ; Dhubhghaill SN; Zakaria N; Koppen C; Tassignon MJ
    J Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 31(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 25751834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoperative PAR corneal topography system (CTS): comparison of its keratometric readings to manual keratometer, auto-keratometer, EyeSys Corneal Analysis system, and slit lamp PAR CTS in healthy eyes.
    Uçakhan OO; Sternberg G; Bodian C; Kelliher K; Asbell PA
    CLAO J; 2000 Jul; 26(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 10946987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the ARK-700A autokeratometer and Medmont E300 corneal topographer when measuring peripheral corneal curvature.
    González-Méijome JM; Jorge J; Queiros A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 15315653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.