These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1640 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1763238)
1. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment. Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Epidemiological and experimental applications to occupational cancer prevention. Vainio H; Hemminki K J UOEH; 1989 Mar; 11 Suppl():323-45. PubMed ID: 2664947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental and chemical carcinogenesis. Wogan GN; Hecht SS; Felton JS; Conney AH; Loeb LA Semin Cancer Biol; 2004 Dec; 14(6):473-86. PubMed ID: 15489140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals-new aspects to be considered in a European perspective. Bolt HM; Foth H; Hengstler JG; Degen GH Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 15177638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens? Gaylor DW Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity. Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing. Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E; Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes. Kirkland DJ; Henderson L; Marzin D; Müller L; Parry JM; Speit G; Tweats DJ; Williams GM Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk assessment of carcinogenic chemicals in The Netherlands. Health Council of The Netherlands: Committee on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenicity of Chemical Substances. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Feb; 19(1):14-30. PubMed ID: 8159812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Issues in the design and interpretation of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies in rodents: approaches to dose selection. Rhomberg LR; Baetcke K; Blancato J; Bus J; Cohen S; Conolly R; Dixit R; Doe J; Ekelman K; Fenner-Crisp P; Harvey P; Hattis D; Jacobs A; Jacobson-Kram D; Lewandowski T; Liteplo R; Pelkonen O; Rice J; Somers D; Turturro A; West W; Olin S Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007; 37(9):729-837. PubMed ID: 17957539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens. Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling. Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice. Battershill JM; Fielder RJ Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 17(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 9617631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Approaches to the risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in food: a critical appraisal. O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Constable A; Dybing E; Müller DJ; Schlatter J; Slob W; Tueting W; van Benthem J; Williams GM; Wolfreys A Food Chem Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):1613-35. PubMed ID: 16887251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterizing and predicting carcinogenicity and mode of action using conventional and toxicogenomics methods. Waters MD; Jackson M; Lea I Mutat Res; 2010 Dec; 705(3):184-200. PubMed ID: 20399889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Recent progress in the evaluation of the dangers of chemical carcinogens]. Truhaut R J Pharm Belg; 1990; 45(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 2192021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of thresholds on the risk assessment of carcinogens in food. Pratt I; Barlow S; Kleiner J; Larsen JC Mutat Res; 2009 Aug; 678(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 19442758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of gastrointestinal drugs. Brambilla G; Mattioli F; Martelli A Mutagenesis; 2010 Jul; 25(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 20478972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of toxicogenomics to study mechanisms of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity. Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Aubrecht J; Kleinjans JC; Ahr HJ Toxicol Lett; 2009 Apr; 186(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 18822359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]