These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
841 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17632761)
1. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma? Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy? Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology following lumpectomy for breast cancer: a series of 400 procedures. D'Halluin F; Tas P; Rouquette S; Bendavid C; Foucher F; Meshba H; Blanchot J; Coué O; Levêque J Breast; 2009 Aug; 18(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 19515566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery. Fleming FJ; Hill AD; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins NJ; Quinn CM Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15028301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients. Bakhshandeh M; Tutuncuoglu SO; Fischer G; Masood S Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):656-9. PubMed ID: 17854083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer. Smitt MC; Horst K Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lumpectomy and radiation treatment for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Warneke J; Berger R; Johnson C; Stea D; Villar H Am J Surg; 1996 Nov; 172(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 8942552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Yale University experience of early-stage invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) treated with breast conservation treatment (BCT): analysis of clinical-pathologic features, long-term outcomes, and molecular expression of COX-2, Bcl-2, and p53 as a function of histology. Moran MS; Yang Q; Haffty BG Breast J; 2009; 15(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 19995377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast conservation in patients with multiple ipsilateral synchronous cancers. Kaplan J; Giron G; Tartter PI; Bleiweiss IJ; Estabrook A; Smith SR J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Nov; 197(5):726-9. PubMed ID: 14585405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifying patients at risk of compromised margins following breast conservation for lobular carcinoma. Dillon MF; Hill AD; Fleming FJ; O'Doherty A; Quinn CM; McDermott EW; O'Higgins N Am J Surg; 2006 Feb; 191(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 16442946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence. Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preliminary results: double lumpectomies for multicentric breast carcinoma. Kapoor NS; Chung A; Huynh K; Giuliano AE Am Surg; 2012 Dec; 78(12):1345-8. PubMed ID: 23265123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma--a comparison of diagnosis, management and outcome with infiltrating duct carcinoma. Molland JG; Donnellan M; Janu NC; Carmalt HL; Kennedy CW; Gillett DJ Breast; 2004 Oct; 13(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 15454194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conservation therapy. Hwang N; Schiller DE; Crystal P; Maki E; McCready DR Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):3000-9. PubMed ID: 19603233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery. Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selecting patients for breast-conserving therapy: the importance of lobular histology. Morrow M; Keeney K; Scholtens D; Wei J; Steel J; Khan SA Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(12):2563-8. PubMed ID: 16683225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Defining negative margins in DCIS patients treated with breast conservation therapy: The University of Chicago experience. Sahoo S; Recant WM; Jaskowiak N; Tong L; Heimann R Breast J; 2005; 11(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 15982389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]