749 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17632959)
1. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
LeBlanc SM
Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
Stricker BW
McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Criminal madness: cultural iconography and insanity.
Covey RD
Stanford Law Rev; 2009 Apr; 61(6):1375-428. PubMed ID: 19489183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Of pills and needs: involuntarily medicating the psychotic inmate when execution looms.
Cantor JD
Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):117-70. PubMed ID: 17111502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
Klein DW
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
Winick BJ
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Civil commitment and the criminal insanity plea in Israeli law.
Toib JA
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(4):308-18. PubMed ID: 18374417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A National Survey of State Legislation defining mental retardation: implications for policy and practice after Atkins.
DeMatteo D; Marczyk G; Pich M
Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(6):781-802. PubMed ID: 18046743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clark v. Arizona: diminishing the right of mentally ill individuals to a full and fair defense.
Wortzel H; Metzner J
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 17185487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Forcible medication for courtroom competence--the case of Charles Sell.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2004 May; 350(22):2297-301. PubMed ID: 15163782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
Dlugacz HA
Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The American Psychiatric Association's resource document on mental retardation and capital sentencing: implementing Atkins v. Virginia.
Bonnie RJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 15515919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring ethical, legal, and professional issues with the mentally ill on death row.
Plichta JE
J Forensic Nurs; 2008; 4(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 18798882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychiatry and the death penalty: the landmark Supreme Court cases and their ethical implications for the profession.
Kermani EJ; Kantor JE
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 8193393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Commentary: Atkins on a diet--a fit but lean guide for policy-makers.
Fitch WL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):314-6. PubMed ID: 15515921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The judicial side effects of involuntary medication as it relates to a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial: Riggins v. Nevada.
Gutierrez L
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 19(2):355-77. PubMed ID: 11660111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The privatization of the civil commitment process and the state action doctrine: have the mentally ill been systematically stripped of their Fourteenth Amendment rights?
Brooks W
Duquesne Law Rev; 2001; 40(1):1-75. PubMed ID: 16518904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Legislative arguments on execution of mentally ill--special reference to the Constitution of the United States of America].
Yokofujita M
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2005; 107(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 16250116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the death of the death penalty near? The impact of Atkins and Roper on the future of capital punishment for mentally ill defendants.
Shin H
Fordham Law Rev; 2007 Oct; 76(1):465-516. PubMed ID: 17985486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
