389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17633485)
1. Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion.
Chang UK; Kim DH; Lee MC; Willenberg R; Kim SH; Lim J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Jul; 7(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17633485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery.
Park J; Shin JJ; Lim J
World Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 82(6):1388-93. PubMed ID: 24937596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Chang UK; Kim DH; Lee MC; Willenberg R; Kim SH; Lim J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Jul; 7(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 17633486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of lumbar total disc arthroplasty, discectomy, and fusion: effect on adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force.
Gao SG; Lei GH; He HB; Liu H; Xiao WF; Wen T; Liang JY; Li KH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Nov; 15(5):507-14. PubMed ID: 21780862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of noncontiguous cervical disc arthroplasty and noncontiguous cervical discectomy and fusion in the treatment of noncontinuous cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis.
Sun X; Sun S; Zhang T; Kong C; Wang W; Lu S
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 15(1):36. PubMed ID: 32005193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Facet joint contact pressure is not significantly affected by ProDisc cervical disc arthroplasty in sagittal bending: a single-level cadaveric study.
Bauman JA; Jaumard NV; Guarino BB; Weisshaar CL; Lipschutz DE; Welch WC; Winkelstein BA
Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):949-59. PubMed ID: 22975463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical facet force analysis after disc replacement versus fusion.
Patel VV; Wuthrich ZR; McGilvray KC; Lafleur MC; Lindley EM; Sun D; Puttlitz CM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 May; 44():52-58. PubMed ID: 28340364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of lumbar total disc arthroplasty on the segmental motion and intradiscal pressure at the adjacent level: an in vitro biomechanical study: presented at the 2008 Joint Spine Section Meeting Laboratory investigation.
Ingalhalikar AV; Reddy CG; Lim TH; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 19951025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro-analysis of kinematics and intradiscal pressures in cervical arthroplasty versus fusion--A biomechanical study in a sheep model with two semi-constrained prosthesis.
Daentzer D; Welke B; Hurschler C; Husmann N; Jansen C; Flamme CH; Richter BI
Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Mar; 14():27. PubMed ID: 25889378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5-6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Kang H; Park P; La Marca F; Hollister SJ; Lin CY
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E9. PubMed ID: 20568924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.
Park DK; Lin EL; Phillips FM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):721-30. PubMed ID: 20543765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on the operative- and adjacent-level kinematics and intradiscal pressures: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment.
Dmitriev AE; Gill NW; Kuklo TR; Rosner MK
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):918-25. PubMed ID: 18178528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Kretzer RM; Hsu W; Hu N; Umekoji H; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E778-85. PubMed ID: 22228326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Dmitriev AE; Cunningham BW; Hu N; Sell G; Vigna F; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 May; 30(10):1165-72. PubMed ID: 15897831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External and internal responses of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A finite element modeling study.
Purushothaman Y; Yoganandan N; Jebaseelan D; Choi H; Baisden J
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Jun; 106():103735. PubMed ID: 32321632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ProDisc cervical arthroplasty does not alter facet joint contact pressure during lateral bending or axial torsion.
Jaumard NV; Bauman JA; Guarino BB; Gokhale AJ; Lipschutz DE; Weisshaar CL; Welch WC; Winkelstein BA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jan; 38(2):E84-93. PubMed ID: 23132537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical effects on the intermediate segment of noncontiguous hybrid surgery with cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.
Wu TK; Meng Y; Liu H; Wang BY; Hong Y; Rong X; Ding C; Chen H
Spine J; 2019 Jul; 19(7):1254-1263. PubMed ID: 30742975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.
Lazaro BC; Yucesoy K; Yuksel KZ; Kowalczyk I; Rabin D; Fink M; Duggal N
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E6. PubMed ID: 20568921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
