These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Legal issues in peer review for self-insured employers. Ragsdale JC Ala J Med Sci; 1985 Oct; 22(4):409-10. PubMed ID: 4073393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Rhode Island Board of Medical Review. Savastano AA R I Med J (1976); 1984 Nov; 67(11):493-5. PubMed ID: 6595755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Washington State Supreme Court protects quality review committee records. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1984 Mar; 7(6):9-10. PubMed ID: 10265237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Can peer review go public and survive? Peck RL Med Econ; 1979 Dec; 56(26):187-9. PubMed ID: 10273189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Supreme Court hits Oregon docs 1.95 million for anticompetitive behavior done in the name of peer review. Colo Med; 1988 Jul; 85(14):281-2. PubMed ID: 3168405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Disclosure of information to and by peer review organizations. Hawthorne KJ Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Sep; 9(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 10302725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Statutory protection for peer review committees--can it be waived? Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1988 Jul; 77(7):586-7. PubMed ID: 3171431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. PSROs don't have to reveal records, court rules, but the matter isn't resolved. Med World News; 1982 Jan; 23(1):72. PubMed ID: 10273293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. From PSROs to PROs: regs are the next major step for the new peer review law. Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1982; 15(6):10-32. PubMed ID: 10273309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Protection from discovery of hospital peer review committee records. Peterson RN Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Jul; 13(7):6-12. PubMed ID: 10267927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Confidentiality and disclosure of information by Professional Standards Review Organizations. Fed Regist; 1978 Jan; 43(10 Pt 2):2281-4. PubMed ID: 10304671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986. New benefits and burdens for physicians. Mickelsen RA Minn Med; 1987 Dec; 70(12):691-3. PubMed ID: 3696122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comment: Peer review privilege established by Illinois Medical Studies Act does not extend to investigations undertaken by hospital administrations. Mustes JJ; Popovits RM J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Aug; 21(8):191-4. PubMed ID: 10288421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Protecting the public and assuring high practice and professional standards in the physician community: the Rhode Island Board of Medical Licensure and Discipline. Crausman RS Med Health R I; 2003 Sep; 86(9):279-81. PubMed ID: 14556411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Suit surfaces questions on status of PSROs. Blum JD Hosp Med Staff; 1979 Jan; 8(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 10273120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The peer review privilege: a dying cause? McKinney P J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]