These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17633704)

  • 1. Chestwall segmentation in 3D breast ultrasound using a deformable volume model.
    Huisman H; Karssemeijer N
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2007; 20():245-56. PubMed ID: 17633704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chest wall segmentation in automated 3D breast ultrasound scans.
    Tan T; Platel B; Mann RM; Huisman H; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1273-81. PubMed ID: 23273891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining low-, high-level and empirical domain knowledge for automated segmentation of ultrasonic breast lesions.
    Madabhushi A; Metaxas DN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12715992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated 3D ultrasound image segmentation to aid breast cancer image interpretation.
    Gu P; Lee WM; Roubidoux MA; Yuan J; Wang X; Carson PL
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():51-8. PubMed ID: 26547117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic mammary duct detection in 3D ultrasound.
    Gooding MJ; Mellor M; Shipley JA; Broadbent KA; Goddard DA
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):434-41. PubMed ID: 16685875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A method and software for segmentation of anatomic object ensembles by deformable m-reps.
    Pizer SM; Fletcher PT; Joshi S; Gash AG; Stough J; Thall A; Tracton G; Chaney EL
    Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1335-45. PubMed ID: 15984685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deformable segmentation of 3-D ultrasound prostate images using statistical texture matching method.
    Zhan Y; Shen D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):256-72. PubMed ID: 16524083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of breast masses in automated whole breast ultrasound images.
    Moon WK; Shen YW; Huang CS; Chiang LR; Chang RF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):539-48. PubMed ID: 21420580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Completely automated segmentation approach for breast ultrasound images using multiple-domain features.
    Shan J; Cheng HD; Wang Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 38(2):262-75. PubMed ID: 22230134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A hybrid framework for 3D medical image segmentation.
    Chen T; Metaxas D
    Med Image Anal; 2005 Dec; 9(6):547-65. PubMed ID: 15896997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Whole breast lesion detection using naive bayes classifier for portable ultrasound.
    Yang MC; Huang CS; Chen JH; Chang RF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1870-80. PubMed ID: 22975038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning a structured graphical model with boosted top-down features for ultrasound image segmentation.
    Hao Z; Wang Q; Wang X; Kim JB; Hwang Y; Cho BH; Guo P; Lee WK
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2013; 16(Pt 1):227-34. PubMed ID: 24505670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new methodology based on q-entropy for breast lesion classification in 3-D ultrasound images.
    Rodrigues PS; Giraldi GA; Provenzano M; Faria MD; Chang RF; Suri JS
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1048-51. PubMed ID: 17945617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computerized lesion segmentation of breast ultrasound based on marker-controlled watershed transformation.
    Gómez W; Leija L; Alvarenga AV; Infantosi AF; Pereira WC
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):82-95. PubMed ID: 20175469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.
    Jalalian A; Mashohor SB; Mahmud HR; Saripan MI; Ramli AR; Karasfi B
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 23153689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Segmentation of malignant lesions in 3D breast ultrasound using a depth-dependent model.
    Tan T; Gubern-Mérida A; Borelli C; Manniesing R; van Zelst J; Wang L; Zhang W; Platel B; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4074. PubMed ID: 27370126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new automated method for the segmentation and characterization of breast masses on ultrasound images.
    Cui J; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Nees A; Paramagul C; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Shi J
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1553-65. PubMed ID: 19544771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 2D and 3D shape based segmentation using deformable models.
    El-Baz A; Yuksel SE; Shi H; Farag AA; El-Ghar MA; Eldiasty T; Ghoneim MA
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):821-9. PubMed ID: 16686036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast Density Analysis with Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound: Comparison with 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Chen JH; Lee YW; Chan SW; Yeh DC; Chang RF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 May; 42(5):1211-20. PubMed ID: 26831342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing motion artifacts in 3-D breast ultrasound using non-linear registration.
    Boehler T; Peitgen HO
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 2):998-1005. PubMed ID: 18982702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.