155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17633704)
1. Chestwall segmentation in 3D breast ultrasound using a deformable volume model.
Huisman H; Karssemeijer N
Inf Process Med Imaging; 2007; 20():245-56. PubMed ID: 17633704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chest wall segmentation in automated 3D breast ultrasound scans.
Tan T; Platel B; Mann RM; Huisman H; Karssemeijer N
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1273-81. PubMed ID: 23273891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combining low-, high-level and empirical domain knowledge for automated segmentation of ultrasonic breast lesions.
Madabhushi A; Metaxas DN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12715992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated 3D ultrasound image segmentation to aid breast cancer image interpretation.
Gu P; Lee WM; Roubidoux MA; Yuan J; Wang X; Carson PL
Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():51-8. PubMed ID: 26547117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic mammary duct detection in 3D ultrasound.
Gooding MJ; Mellor M; Shipley JA; Broadbent KA; Goddard DA
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):434-41. PubMed ID: 16685875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A method and software for segmentation of anatomic object ensembles by deformable m-reps.
Pizer SM; Fletcher PT; Joshi S; Gash AG; Stough J; Thall A; Tracton G; Chaney EL
Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1335-45. PubMed ID: 15984685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deformable segmentation of 3-D ultrasound prostate images using statistical texture matching method.
Zhan Y; Shen D
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):256-72. PubMed ID: 16524083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of breast masses in automated whole breast ultrasound images.
Moon WK; Shen YW; Huang CS; Chiang LR; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):539-48. PubMed ID: 21420580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Completely automated segmentation approach for breast ultrasound images using multiple-domain features.
Shan J; Cheng HD; Wang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 38(2):262-75. PubMed ID: 22230134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A hybrid framework for 3D medical image segmentation.
Chen T; Metaxas D
Med Image Anal; 2005 Dec; 9(6):547-65. PubMed ID: 15896997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Whole breast lesion detection using naive bayes classifier for portable ultrasound.
Yang MC; Huang CS; Chen JH; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1870-80. PubMed ID: 22975038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Learning a structured graphical model with boosted top-down features for ultrasound image segmentation.
Hao Z; Wang Q; Wang X; Kim JB; Hwang Y; Cho BH; Guo P; Lee WK
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2013; 16(Pt 1):227-34. PubMed ID: 24505670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new methodology based on q-entropy for breast lesion classification in 3-D ultrasound images.
Rodrigues PS; Giraldi GA; Provenzano M; Faria MD; Chang RF; Suri JS
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1048-51. PubMed ID: 17945617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computerized lesion segmentation of breast ultrasound based on marker-controlled watershed transformation.
Gómez W; Leija L; Alvarenga AV; Infantosi AF; Pereira WC
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):82-95. PubMed ID: 20175469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.
Jalalian A; Mashohor SB; Mahmud HR; Saripan MI; Ramli AR; Karasfi B
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 23153689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Segmentation of malignant lesions in 3D breast ultrasound using a depth-dependent model.
Tan T; Gubern-Mérida A; Borelli C; Manniesing R; van Zelst J; Wang L; Zhang W; Platel B; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4074. PubMed ID: 27370126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new automated method for the segmentation and characterization of breast masses on ultrasound images.
Cui J; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Nees A; Paramagul C; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Shi J
Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1553-65. PubMed ID: 19544771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 2D and 3D shape based segmentation using deformable models.
El-Baz A; Yuksel SE; Shi H; Farag AA; El-Ghar MA; Eldiasty T; Ghoneim MA
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 2):821-9. PubMed ID: 16686036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast Density Analysis with Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound: Comparison with 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Chen JH; Lee YW; Chan SW; Yeh DC; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 May; 42(5):1211-20. PubMed ID: 26831342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing motion artifacts in 3-D breast ultrasound using non-linear registration.
Boehler T; Peitgen HO
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 2):998-1005. PubMed ID: 18982702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
