These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1763392)
1. Evaluation of a new hydrocolloid occlusive dressing for central catheters used in total parenteral nutrition. Haffejee AA; Moodley J; Pillay K; Singh B; Thomson S; Bhamjee A S Afr J Surg; 1991 Dec; 29(4):142-6. PubMed ID: 1763392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective, randomized trial of gauze and two polyurethane dressings for site care of pulmonary artery catheters: implications for catheter management. Maki DG; Stolz SS; Wheeler S; Mermel LA Crit Care Med; 1994 Nov; 22(11):1729-37. PubMed ID: 7956275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Infection rates in single- and double-lumen central venous catheters in critically ill patients. Gupta S; Batra YK; Puri GD; Panigrahi D; Roy S Natl Med J India; 1995; 8(3):114-7. PubMed ID: 7780350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Once- versus twice-weekly changing of central venous catheter occlusive dressing in intensive chemotherapy patients: results of a randomized multicenter study. Vokurka S; Bystricka E; Visokaiova M; Scudlova J Med Sci Monit; 2009 Mar; 15(3):CR107-10. PubMed ID: 19247240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Failure of antiseptic bonding to prevent central venous catheter-related infection and sepsis. Ciresi DL; Albrecht RM; Volkers PA; Scholten DJ Am Surg; 1996 Aug; 62(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 8712561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of central venous catheter dressings in bone marrow transplant recipients. Brandt B; DePalma J; Irwin M; Shogan J; Lucke JF Oncol Nurs Forum; 1996 Jun; 23(5):829-36. PubMed ID: 8792352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved long-term maintenance of central venous catheters with a new dressing technique. Eisenberg PG; Howard MP; Gianino MS J Intraven Nurs; 1990; 13(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 2401932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of a new guideline for central venous catheter care on sepsis in total parenteral nutrition: experience in Ramathibodi Hospital. Roongpisuthipong C; Getupook V; Chindavijak B J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Oct; 90(10):2030-8. PubMed ID: 18041420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications and cost associated with parenteral nutrition delivered to hospitalized patients through either subclavian or peripherally-inserted central catheters. Cowl CT; Weinstock JV; Al-Jurf A; Ephgrave K; Murray JA; Dillon K Clin Nutr; 2000 Aug; 19(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 10952794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Percutaneous, tunneled silicone elastomer central venous catheters for total parenteral nutrition: low sepsis and thrombosis rate. A prospective study of 315 catheters. Sandstedt S; Hesselvik F; Marklund T; Stenport G Nutrition; 1989; 5(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 2520252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bacterial infection of central venous catheters in short-term total parenteral nutrition. Chan L; Ngeow YF; Parasakthi N Med J Malaysia; 1998 Mar; 53(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 10968131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Central venous catheter use. Part 2: infectious complications. Polderman KH; Girbes AR Intensive Care Med; 2002 Jan; 28(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 11818995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microbiology difference between colonized catheters and catheter-related bloodstream infections. Lin C; Lin MT; Hsieh DY; Chao YF; Yeh SL; Wu MS; Lin JT; Lee PH; Chang KJ; Chen WJ Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(54):1821-4. PubMed ID: 14696413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of central venous catheter type and methods on catheter-related colonization and bacteraemia. Moretti EW; Ofstead CL; Kristy RM; Wetzler HP J Hosp Infect; 2005 Oct; 61(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16026898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Antiseptic chamber-containing hub reduces central venous catheter-related infection: a prospective, randomized study. León C; Alvarez-Lerma F; Ruiz-Santana S; González V; de la Torre MV; Sierra R; León M; Rodrigo JJ Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5):1318-24. PubMed ID: 12771597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association between microorganism growth at the catheter insertion site and colonization of the catheter in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. Bjornson HS; Colley R; Bower RH; Duty VP; Schwartz-Fulton JT; Fischer JE Surgery; 1982 Oct; 92(4):720-7. PubMed ID: 6812229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Triple- vs single-lumen central venous catheters. A prospective study in a critically ill population. Gil RT; Kruse JA; Thill-Baharozian MC; Carlson RW Arch Intern Med; 1989 May; 149(5):1139-43. PubMed ID: 2497712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Avoiding an unnecessary outcome. A comparative trial between IV3000 and a conventional film dressing to assess rates of catheter-related sepsis. Keenlyside D Prof Nurse; 1993 Feb; 8(5):288-91. PubMed ID: 8451247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Care of the central venous catheterization site: the use of a transparent polyurethane film. Vazquez RM; Jarrard MM JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1984; 8(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 6425522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]