These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17634639)

  • 1. Latency analysis of single auditory evoked M100 responses by spatio-temporal filtering.
    Wübbeler G; Link A; Burghoff M; Trahms L; Elster C
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4383-92. PubMed ID: 17634639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic latency variation of the auditory evoked M100: from average to single-trial data.
    Salajegheh A; Link A; Elster C; Burghoff M; Sander T; Trahms L; Poeppel D
    Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 15325376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing a template approach and complex bandpass filtering for single-trial analysis of auditory evoked M100.
    Link A; Burghoff M; Salajegheh A; Poeppel D; Trahms L; Elster C
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Feb; 52(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 17313344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-trial classification of MEG recordings.
    Guimaraes MP; Wong DK; Uy ET; Grosenick L; Suppes P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Mar; 54(3):436-43. PubMed ID: 17355055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-trial evoked brain responses modeled by multivariate matching pursuit.
    Sieluzycki C; König R; Matysiak A; Kuś R; Ircha D; Durka PJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Jan; 56(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 19224721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency specific impairment of automatic pitch change detection by fMRI acoustic noise: an MEG study.
    Novitski N; Maess B; Tervaniemi M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Jul; 155(1):149-59. PubMed ID: 16530843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving auditory steady-state response detection using independent component analysis on multichannel EEG data.
    Van Dun B; Wouters J; Moonen M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jul; 54(7):1220-30. PubMed ID: 17605353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phase stability analysis of chirp evoked auditory brainstem responses by Gabor frame operators.
    Corona-Strauss FI; Delb W; Schick B; Strauss DJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2009 Dec; 17(6):530-6. PubMed ID: 19775985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus induced reset of 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses.
    Ross B; Herdman AT; Pantev C
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():21. PubMed ID: 16012609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A maximum-likelihood estimator for trial-to-trial variations in noisy MEG/EEG data sets.
    de Munck JC; Bijma F; Gaura P; Sieluzycki CA; Branco MI; Heethaar RM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2123-8. PubMed ID: 15605859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Array-gain constraint minimum-norm spatial filter with recursively updated gram matrix for biomagnetic source imaging.
    Kumihashi I; Sekihara K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 57(6):1358-65. PubMed ID: 20172787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simple wavelet-based test for evoked responses.
    Norton JD; Eswaran H; Lowery CL; Wilson JD; Murphy P; Preissl H
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Sep; 138(1-2):157-64. PubMed ID: 15325124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The M100 component of evoked magnetic fields differs by scaling factors: implications for signal averaging.
    Zacharias N; Sielużycki C; Kordecki W; König R; Heil P
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1069-82. PubMed ID: 21342204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Frequency spectra and filtering of the early auditory evoked potential].
    Tietze G; Kevanishvili Z
    HNO; 1990 Nov; 38(11):399-407. PubMed ID: 2289897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiscale detection of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Marozas V; Janusauskas A; Lukosevicius A; Sörnmo L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1586-93. PubMed ID: 16916093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory evoked responses are additive to brain oscillations.
    Mäkinen VT; Tiitinen H; May PJ
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():45. PubMed ID: 16015712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-trial dynamical estimation of event-related potentials: a Kalman filter-based approach.
    Georgiadis SD; Ranta-aho PO; Tarvainen MP; Karjalainen PA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Aug; 52(8):1397-406. PubMed ID: 16119235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective response detection technique in frequency-domain for reflecting changes in MLAEP.
    Cagy M; Infantosi AF
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Oct; 29(8):910-7. PubMed ID: 17174588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.