116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17634649)
1. A two isocenter IMRT technique with a controlled junction dose for long volume targets.
Zeng GG; Heaton RK; Catton CN; Chung PW; O'Sullivan B; Lau M; Parent A; Jaffray DA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4541-52. PubMed ID: 17634649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An interlaced IMRT technique for elongated tumor volumes.
Meyer J; Richter A; Pfreundner L; Guckenberger M; Krieger T; Schwab F; Flentje M
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(2):170-8. PubMed ID: 19410147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving dose homogeneity in large breasts by IMRT: efficacy and dosimetric accuracy of different techniques.
Abo-Madyan Y; Polednik M; Rahn A; Schneider F; Dobler B; Wenz F; Lohr F
Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 Feb; 184(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 18259700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric comparison of split field and fixed jaw techniques for large IMRT target volumes in the head and neck.
Srivastava SP; Das IJ; Kumar A; Johnstone PA
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 19944592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Importing measured field fluences into the treatment planning system to validate a breathing synchronized DMLC-IMRT irradiation technique.
Verellen D; Tournel K; Linthout N; Soete G; Wauters T; Storme G
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 16533540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct aperture optimization of breast IMRT and the dosimetric impact of respiration motion.
Zhang G; Jiang Z; Shepard D; Zhang B; Yu C
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):N357-69. PubMed ID: 17019024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Step and shoot IMRT to mobile targets and techniques to mitigate the interplay effect.
Ehler ED; Tomé WA
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(13):4311-24. PubMed ID: 19531851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
Jones S; Williams M
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of conformal and intensity modulated treatment planning techniques for early prostate cancer.
Vaarkamp J; Malde R; Dixit S; Hamilton CS
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Jun; 53(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 19624299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An imrt technique to increase therapeutic ratio of breast irradiation in patients with early-stage left breast cancer: limiting second malignancies.
Ahmed RS; De Los Santos JF; Fiveash JB; Keene KS; Popple RA
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 18262126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A dynamic supraclavicular field-matching technique for head-and-neck cancer patients treated with IMRT.
Duan J; Shen S; Spencer SA; Ahmed RS; Popple RA; Ye SJ; Brezovich IA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):959-72. PubMed ID: 15465215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Verification of a rounded leaf-end MLC model used in a radiotherapy treatment planning system.
Williams MJ; Metcalfe P
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(4):N65-78. PubMed ID: 16467576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The IMRT information process-mastering the degrees of freedom in external beam therapy.
Ahnesjö A; Hårdemark B; Isacsson U; Montelius A
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(13):R381-402. PubMed ID: 16790914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment and minimization of contralateral breast dose for conventional and intensity modulated breast radiotherapy.
Burmeister J; Alvarado N; Way S; McDermott P; Bossenberger T; Jaenisch H; Patel R; Washington T
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 18262117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comprehensive clinical 3-dimensional dosimetric analysis of forward planned IMRT and conventional wedge planned techniques for intact breast radiotherapy.
Herrick JS; Neill CJ; Rosser PF
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 18262125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric discrepancies caused by differing MLC parameters for dynamic IMRT.
Wasbø E; Valen H
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):405-15. PubMed ID: 18184995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intensity-modulated vs. conformal radiotherapy of parotid gland tumors: potential impact on hearing loss.
Lamers-Kuijper E; Schwarz M; Rasch C; Mijnheer B
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 17980823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient setup and verification for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
Jones AO; Kleiman MT
Med Dosim; 2003; 28(3):175-83. PubMed ID: 14563437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
