222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1763580)
21. Policing the profession.
Lowen T
Minn Med; 2012 Sep; 95(9):18-21. PubMed ID: 23094408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Responsibility of the vaccinating physician].
Biclet P
Bull Soc Pathol Exot; 1997; 90(4):239. PubMed ID: 9479459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Legal liability of subordinate physicians, legal liability for management responsibility from the jurisprudence viewpoint].
Weissauer W
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 8588433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [The so-called specialist standard from the viewpoint of the legal consultant].
Baur U
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 8588430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Malpractice nightmare. Good medicine didn't protect me.
Minn Med; 1993 Nov; 76(11):8-9, 36. PubMed ID: 8179657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Doctors on trial: a comparison of American and Jewish legal approaches to medical malpractice.
Fruchter J
Am J Law Med; 1993; 19(4):453-95. PubMed ID: 7942865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law--stand for evaluating medical expert assessment].
Kienzle HF
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):592-6. PubMed ID: 9064929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [The so-called specialist status from the viewpoint of jurisdiction of the German court of justice].
Steffen E
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):595-7. PubMed ID: 8588429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Expert testimony in malpractice suits].
Deutsch E
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 8588427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Quality assurance in surgical gynecology from the legal viewpoint].
Ratzel R
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(12):674-5. PubMed ID: 8585364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Doctors take the stage.
Peota C
Minn Med; 2005 Jun; 88(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 16050296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The use of mid-level providers in dermatology: a liability risk?
Nestor MS
Semin Cutan Med Surg; 2005 Sep; 24(3):148-51. PubMed ID: 16202951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [The crisis of medical responsibility].
Fagnart JL
Rev Med Brux; 1999 Jun; 20(3):127-8. PubMed ID: 10429534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Resolving the legal status in a doubtful case before the court].
Gamm S
Pflege Z; 2012 Sep; 65(9):562-4. PubMed ID: 22994129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Two bites at the apple: holding physician practices directly liable for medical malpractice.
Jolley KM; Wilson RF
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 2004; 59(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 15354367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Liability in ambulatory surgery from the legal viewpoint].
Jansen C
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):663-6. PubMed ID: 8588442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Treatment errors and sequelae. The physician's image].
Mäulen B
MMW Fortschr Med; 2000 Jun; 142(22):4-8, 10. PubMed ID: 10870376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Consultations and risks of malpractice.
Ohio Med; 1991 Mar; 87(3):141-2. PubMed ID: 2030885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Bill.
Frizelle F
N Z Med J; 2002 Nov; 115(1166):U254. PubMed ID: 12552273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. What is this thing called "malpractice"?
Monyak RP
J Med Assoc Ga; 1993 Sep; 82(9):489-90. PubMed ID: 8228679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
