These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17636616)

  • 1. WITHDRAWN: Single versus two layer suturing for closing the uterine incision at Caesarean section.
    Enkin MW; Wilkinson C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; 2006(3):CD000192. PubMed ID: 17636616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single versus two layer suturing for closing the uterine incision at caesarean section.
    Enkin MW; Wilkinson C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000192. PubMed ID: 10796177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section.
    Dodd JM; Anderson ER; Gates S; Grivell RM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; 2014(7):CD004732. PubMed ID: 25048608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section.
    Dodd JM; Anderson ER; Gates S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD004732. PubMed ID: 18646108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes.
    Bamigboye AA; Hofmeyr GJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Aug; 2014(8):CD000163. PubMed ID: 25110856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Alderdice F; McKenna D; Dornan J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (2):CD003577. PubMed ID: 12804476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section.
    Bamigboye AA; Hofmeyr GJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (4):CD000163. PubMed ID: 14583915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):CD003577. PubMed ID: 23152219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Techniques for assisting difficult delivery at caesarean section.
    Waterfall H; Grivell RM; Dodd JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jan; 2016(1):CD004944. PubMed ID: 26827159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-closure of peritoneal surfaces at caesarean section--a systematic review.
    Bamigboye AA; Hofmeyr GJ
    S Afr Med J; 2005 Feb; 95(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 15751208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peritoneal non-closure at caesarean section.
    Wilkinson CS; Enkin MW
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000163. PubMed ID: 10796163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Barbed vs conventional suture at cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Agarwal S; D'Souza R; Ryu M; Maxwell C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Jun; 100(6):1010-1018. PubMed ID: 33404082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Barbed sutures versus conventional sutures for uterine closure at cesarean section; a randomized controlled trial.
    Zayed MA; Fouda UM; Elsetohy KA; Zayed SM; Hashem AT; Youssef MA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Mar; 32(5):710-717. PubMed ID: 29082807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extra-abdominal versus intra-abdominal repair of the uterine incision at caesarean section.
    Jacobs-Jokhan D; Hofmeyr G
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004 Oct; 2004(4):CD000085. PubMed ID: 15494988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new technique for uterine incision closure at the time of cesarean section: does it make a difference?
    Elkhouly NI; Abdelaal NK; Solyman AE; Elkelani OA; Elbasueny BF; Elhalaby AF
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):416-423. PubMed ID: 34155957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saccone G; McCurdy R; Bujold E; Bifulco G; Berghella V
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):578-583. PubMed ID: 28070914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure.
    Hanacek J; Vojtech J; Urbankova I; Krcmar M; Křepelka P; Feyereisl J; Krofta L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jan; 99(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 31441500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical dilatation of the cervix during elective caeserean section before the onset of labour for reducing postoperative morbidity.
    Liabsuetrakul T; Peeyananjarassri K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD008019. PubMed ID: 30096215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Knotless Barbed versus Conventional Suture for Closure of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Raischer HB; Massalha M; Iskander R; Izhaki I; Salim R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 29(7):832-839. PubMed ID: 35533955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.