BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17637144)

  • 1. Inter-observer agreement using the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale.
    Manos D; Petrie DA; Beveridge RC; Walter S; Ducharme J
    CJEM; 2002 Jan; 4(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 17637144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement.
    Beveridge R; Ducharme J; Janes L; Beaulieu S; Walter S
    Ann Emerg Med; 1999 Aug; 34(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 10424915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in Saudi Arabia.
    Alquraini M; Awad E; Hijazi R
    Int J Emerg Med; 2015 Dec; 8(1):80. PubMed ID: 26251308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prehospital Application of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale by Emergency Medical Services.
    Leeies M; Ffrench C; Strome T; Weldon E; Bullard M; Grierson R
    CJEM; 2017 Jan; 19(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 27508353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: interrater and intrarater agreement from a community and an academic emergency department.
    Fernandes CM; McLeod S; Krause J; Shah A; Jewell J; Smith B; Rollins L
    CJEM; 2013 Jul; 15(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 23777994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter-rater reliability of a computerized presenting-complaint-linked triage system in an urban emergency department.
    Grafstein E; Innes G; Westman J; Christenson J; Thorne A
    CJEM; 2003 Sep; 5(5):323-9. PubMed ID: 17466140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interrater agreement of Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale scores assigned by base hospital and emergency department nurses.
    Dallaire C; Poitras J; Aubin K; Lavoie A; Moore L; Audet G
    CJEM; 2010 Jan; 12(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 20078918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of inter-observer reliability of two five-level triage and acuity scales: a randomized controlled trial.
    Worster A; Gilboy N; Fernandes CM; Eitel D; Eva K; Geisler R; Tanabe P
    CJEM; 2004 Jul; 6(4):240-5. PubMed ID: 17381999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emergency department triage: do experienced nurses agree on triage scores?
    Dallaire C; Poitras J; Aubin K; Lavoie A; Moore L
    J Emerg Med; 2012 Jun; 42(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 22209550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Agreement among pediatric health care professionals with the pediatric Canadian triage and acuity scale guidelines.
    Bergeron S; Gouin S; Bailey B; Amre DK; Patel H
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2004 Aug; 20(8):514-8. PubMed ID: 15295246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pediatric triage variations among nurses, pediatric and emergency residents using the Canadian triage and acuity scale.
    Alshaibi S; AlBassri T; AlQeuflie S; Philip W; Alharthy N
    BMC Emerg Med; 2021 Nov; 21(1):146. PubMed ID: 34809562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and concordance of nurses in emergency department triage.
    Göransson K; Ehrenberg A; Marklund B; Ehnfors M
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2005 Dec; 19(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 16324070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analyzing the Usability of the 5-Level Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale By Paramedics in the Prehospital Environment.
    Smith DT; Snyder A; Hollen PJ; Anderson JG; Caterino JM
    J Emerg Nurs; 2015 Nov; 41(6):489-95. PubMed ID: 26001701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: testing the mental health categories.
    Brown AM; Clarke DE; Spence J
    Open Access Emerg Med; 2015; 7():79-84. PubMed ID: 27147893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Triage of the pediatric patient in the emergency department: are we all in agreement?
    Maldonado T; Avner JR
    Pediatrics; 2004 Aug; 114(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 15286216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of training on nurse agreement using an electronic triage system.
    Dong SL; Bullard MJ; Meurer DP; Blitz S; Holroyd BR; Rowe BH
    CJEM; 2007 Jul; 9(4):260-6. PubMed ID: 17626690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictors of admission to hospital of patients triaged as nonurgent using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale.
    Lin D; Worster A
    CJEM; 2013 Nov; 15(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 24176459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Observer agreement of the Manchester Triage System and the Emergency Severity Index: a simulation study.
    Storm-Versloot MN; Ubbink DT; Chin a Choi V; Luitse JS
    Emerg Med J; 2009 Aug; 26(8):556-60. PubMed ID: 19625548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do prehospital providers and emergency nurses agree on triage assignment?: an efficacy study.
    Skjøt-Arkil H; Pontoppidan LL; Laursen JO; Giebner M; Andersen JD; Mogensen CB
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2019 Feb; 26(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 28915163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of triage assessments among pediatric registered nurses and pediatric emergency physicians.
    Bergeron S; Gouin S; Bailey B; Patel H
    Acad Emerg Med; 2002 Dec; 9(12):1397-401. PubMed ID: 12460843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.