BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

542 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17637405)

  • 1. Initial fixation strength of massive rotator cuff tears: in vitro comparison of single-row suture anchor and transosseous tunnel constructs.
    Tashjian RZ; Levanthal E; Spenciner DB; Green A; Fleming BC
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Jul; 23(7):710-6. PubMed ID: 17637405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Initial fixation strength of transosseous-equivalent suture bridge rotator cuff repair is comparable with transosseous repair.
    Behrens SB; Bruce B; Zonno AJ; Paller D; Green A
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 Jan; 40(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 22088578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Failure analysis of rotator cuff repair: a comparison of three double-row techniques.
    Zheng N; Harris HW; Andrews JR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 May; 90(5):1034-42. PubMed ID: 18451396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of transosseous rotator cuff repair: do anchors really matter?
    Salata MJ; Sherman SL; Lin EC; Sershon RA; Gupta A; Shewman E; Wang VM; Cole BJ; Romeo AA; Verma NN
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 Feb; 41(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 23239668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of single-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair technique versus transosseous repair technique.
    Tocci SL; Tashjian RZ; Leventhal E; Spenciner DB; Green A; Fleming BC
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2008; 17(5):808-14. PubMed ID: 18595743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-row modified mason-allen versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical and surface area comparison.
    Nelson CO; Sileo MJ; Grossman MG; Serra-Hsu F
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Aug; 24(8):941-8. PubMed ID: 18657744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A biomechanical comparison of tendon-bone interface motion and cyclic loading between single-row, triple-loaded cuff repairs and double-row, suture-tape cuff repairs using biocomposite anchors.
    Barber FA; Drew OR
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Sep; 28(9):1197-205. PubMed ID: 22592123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro analysis of rotator cuff repairs: a comparison of arthroscopically inserted tacks or anchors with open transosseous repairs.
    Chhabra A; Goradia VK; Francke EI; Baer GS; Monahan T; Kline AJ; Miller MD
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Mar; 21(3):323-7. PubMed ID: 15756187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A laboratory comparison of a new arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair to a double row transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair using suture anchors.
    Kummer FJ; Hahn M; Day M; Meislin RJ; Jazrawi LM
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2013; 71(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 24032613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair.
    Lorbach O; Bachelier F; Vees J; Kohn D; Pape D
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Aug; 36(8):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18296541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical Comparison of Standard and Linked Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repairs in a Human Cadaver Model.
    Meisel AF; Henninger HB; Barber FA; Getelman MH
    Arthroscopy; 2017 May; 33(5):938-944. PubMed ID: 28089497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study.
    Meier SW; Meier JD
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1168-73. PubMed ID: 17084292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tendon-bone interface motion in transosseous suture and suture anchor rotator cuff repair techniques.
    Ahmad CS; Stewart AM; Izquierdo R; Bigliani LU
    Am J Sports Med; 2005 Nov; 33(11):1667-71. PubMed ID: 16093532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture-anchor repair configurations.
    Cole BJ; ElAttrache NS; Anbari A
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Jun; 23(6):662-9. PubMed ID: 17560482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
    Smith CD; Alexander S; Hill AM; Huijsmans PE; Bull AM; Amis AA; De Beer JF; Wallace AL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Nov; 88(11):2425-31. PubMed ID: 17079400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anchored Transosseous-Equivalent Versus Anchorless Transosseous Rotator Cuff Repair: A Biomechanical Analysis in a Cadaveric Model.
    Kilcoyne KG; Guillaume SG; Hannan CV; Langdale ER; Belkoff SM; Srikumaran U
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Aug; 45(10):2364-2371. PubMed ID: 28520458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical Comparison of Transosseous Knotless Rotator Cuff Repair Versus Transosseous Equivalent Repair: Half The Anchors With Equivalent Biomechanics?
    Tashjian RZ; Hoy RW; Helgerson JR; Guss AD; Henninger HB; Burks RT
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Jan; 34(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 29079260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Importance of Tear Edge Fixation in Modified Transosseous-Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair: A Biomechanical Study.
    Roghani R; Snir N; Wolfson TS; Rokito AS
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Mar; 73(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 26516996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical validation of load-sharing rip-stop fixation for the repair of tissue-deficient rotator cuff tears.
    Burkhart SS; Denard PJ; Konicek J; Hanypsiak BT
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Feb; 42(2):457-62. PubMed ID: 24375848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A biomechanical analysis of point of failure during lateral-row tensioning in transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair.
    Dierckman BD; Goldstein JL; Hammond KE; Karas SG
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Jan; 28(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 22019232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.