These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17638503)

  • 1. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
    Hahn U; Oaksford M
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating science arguments: evidence, uncertainty, and argument strength.
    Corner A; Hahn U
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 19751071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of contextual factors on the judgement of informal reasoning fallacies.
    Neuman Y; Weinstock MP; Glasner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):411-25. PubMed ID: 16618643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian approach to the argument from ignorance.
    Oaksford M; Hahn U
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2004 Jun; 58(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 15285597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discounting testimony with the argument ad hominem and a Bayesian congruent prior model.
    Bhatia JS; Oaksford M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1548-59. PubMed ID: 26147667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pseudodiagnosticity revisited.
    Crupi V; Tentori K; Lombardi L
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):971-85. PubMed ID: 19839693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effective argumentation.
    Gunderman RB; Chou HY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1345-9. PubMed ID: 21606298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
    Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The macrostructure of informal arguments: a proposed model and analysis.
    Ricco RB
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):1021-51. PubMed ID: 12881169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward an experimental account of argumentation: the case of the slippery slope and the ad hominem arguments.
    Lillo-Unglaube M; Canales-Johnson A; Navarrete G; Bravo CF
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1420. PubMed ID: 25566112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian argumentation and the value of logical validity.
    Eva B; Hartmann S
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Oct; 125(5):806-821. PubMed ID: 30024177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New Paradigms in the Psychology of Reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2020 Jan; 71():305-330. PubMed ID: 31514580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical judgement in the interpretation of evidence: A Bayesian approach.
    Harbison J
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Dec; 15(12):1489-97. PubMed ID: 17118071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rational hypocrisy: a Bayesian analysis based on informal argumentation and slippery slopes.
    Rai TS; Holyoak KJ
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(7):1456-67. PubMed ID: 24646370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of a reason's truth-value on the judgment of a fallacious argument.
    Neuman Y; Glassner A; Weinstock M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Jun; 116(2):173-84. PubMed ID: 15158181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reasoning on conflicting information: An empirical study of Formal Argumentation.
    Guillaume M; Cramer M; van der Torre L; Schiltz C
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273225. PubMed ID: 35984811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling the effects of argument length and validity on inductive and deductive reasoning.
    Rotello CM; Heit E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1317-30. PubMed ID: 19686024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games.
    Frank MC; Goodman ND
    Science; 2012 May; 336(6084):998. PubMed ID: 22628647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From mere coincidences to meaningful discoveries.
    Griffiths TL; Tenenbaum JB
    Cognition; 2007 May; 103(2):180-226. PubMed ID: 16678145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.