141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17638662)
1. Correlating routine cytology, quantitative nuclear morphometry by digital image analysis, and genetic alterations by fluorescence in situ hybridization to assess the sensitivity of cytology for detecting pancreatobiliary tract malignancy.
Barr Fritcher EG; Kipp BR; Slezak JM; Moreno-Luna LE; Gores GJ; Levy MJ; Roberts LR; Halling KC; Sebo TJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Aug; 128(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 17638662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multivariable model using advanced cytologic methods for the evaluation of indeterminate pancreatobiliary strictures.
Fritcher EG; Kipp BR; Halling KC; Oberg TN; Bryant SC; Tarrell RF; Gores GJ; Levy MJ; Clayton AC; Sebo TJ; Roberts LR
Gastroenterology; 2009 Jun; 136(7):2180-6. PubMed ID: 19232347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preliminary experience comparing routine cytology results with the composite results of digital image analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients undergoing EUS-guided FNA.
Levy MJ; Clain JE; Clayton A; Halling KC; Kipp BR; Rajan E; Roberts LR; Root RM; Sebo TJ; Topazian MD; Wang KK; Wiersema MJ; Gores GJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Sep; 66(3):483-90. PubMed ID: 17725938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification of malignant cytologic criteria in pancreatobiliary brushings with corresponding positive fluorescence in situ hybridization results.
Barr Fritcher EG; Caudill JL; Blue JE; Djuric K; Feipel L; Maritim BK; Ragheb AA; Halling KC; Henry MR; Clayton AC
Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Sep; 136(3):442-9. PubMed ID: 21846921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Optimized Set of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Probes for Detection of Pancreatobiliary Tract Cancer in Cytology Brush Samples.
Barr Fritcher EG; Voss JS; Brankley SM; Campion MB; Jenkins SM; Keeney ME; Henry MR; Kerr SM; Chaiteerakij R; Pestova EV; Clayton AC; Zhang J; Roberts LR; Gores GJ; Halling KC; Kipp BR
Gastroenterology; 2015 Dec; 149(7):1813-1824.e1. PubMed ID: 26327129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advanced cytologic approaches for the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary cancer.
Fritcher EG; Halling KC
Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2010 May; 26(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 20393279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advanced cytologic techniques for the detection of malignant pancreatobiliary strictures.
Moreno Luna LE; Kipp B; Halling KC; Sebo TJ; Kremers WK; Roberts LR; Barr Fritcher EG; Levy MJ; Gores GJ
Gastroenterology; 2006 Oct; 131(4):1064-72. PubMed ID: 17030177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of polyomavirus-infected renal transplant recipients' urine specimens: correlation of routine urine cytology, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and digital image analysis.
Kipp BR; Sebo TJ; Griffin MD; Ihrke JM; Halling KC
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Dec; 124(6):854-61. PubMed ID: 16416734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. UroVysion Multi-Target Fluorescence in situ Hybridization Assay for the Detection of Malignant Bile Duct Brushing Specimens: A Comparison with Routine Cytology.
Zhai J
Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 29734171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. FISHing for pancreatobiliary tract malignancy in endoscopic brushings enhances the sensitivity of routine cytology.
Barr Fritcher EG; Kipp BR; Halling KC; Clayton AC
Cytopathology; 2014 Oct; 25(5):288-301. PubMed ID: 25073411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective evaluation of advanced molecular markers and imaging techniques in patients with indeterminate bile duct strictures.
Levy MJ; Baron TH; Clayton AC; Enders FB; Gostout CJ; Halling KC; Kipp BR; Petersen BT; Roberts LR; Rumalla A; Sebo TJ; Topazian MD; Wiersema MJ; Gores GJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 May; 103(5):1263-73. PubMed ID: 18477350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving the accuracy of pancreatobiliary tract cytology with fluorescence in situ hybridization: a molecular test with proven clinical success.
Kipp BR; Barr Fritcher EG; Pettengill JE; Halling KC; Clayton AC
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Nov; 121(11):610-9. PubMed ID: 23633236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Numerical aberrations of chromosomes 11 and 17 detected by fish--fluorescence in situ hybridization combined with cytology in exfoliated cells from voided urine in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder].
Asali MG; Kaneti J; Manor E
Harefuah; 2007 Dec; 146(12):914-9, 1000. PubMed ID: 18254439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative diagnostic value of urine cytology, UBC-ELISA, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of transitional cell carcinoma of urinary bladder in routine clinical practice.
May M; Hakenberg OW; Gunia S; Pohling P; Helke C; Lübbe L; Nowack R; Siegsmund M; Hoschke B
Urology; 2007 Sep; 70(3):449-53. PubMed ID: 17688921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization as a non-invasive technique in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
Marín-Aguilera M; Mengual L; Ribal MJ; Musquera M; Ars E; Villavicencio H; Algaba F; Alcaraz A
Eur Urol; 2007 Feb; 51(2):409-15; discussion 415. PubMed ID: 17010508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fluorescence in situ hybridization in diagnostic cytology.
Halling KC; Kipp BR
Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1137-44. PubMed ID: 17640552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Study on the diagnosis of urothelial cancer using multi-colour fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)--comparative analysis between FISH and cytology].
Onishi T; Ichikawa T; Igarashi T
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2008 Apr; 54(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 18516915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
Luo B; Li W; Deng CH; Zheng FF; Sun XZ; Wang DH; Dai YP
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2009 Mar; 189(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 19215789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
