These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17639194)

  • 21. Evaluation of apically extruded debris in conventional and rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Bidar M; Rastegar AF; Ghaziani P; Namazikhah MS
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Sep; 32(9):665-71. PubMed ID: 15553960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris and Irrigant Produced by Different Nickel-Titanium Instrument Systems in Primary Teeth.
    Kucukyilmaz E; Savas S; Saygili G; Uysal B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Nov; 16(11):864-8. PubMed ID: 26718292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Extrusion of Debris from Curved Root Canals Instrumented up to Different Working Lengths Using Different Reciprocating Systems.
    Mendonça de Moura JD; Bueno CEDS; Fontana CE; Pelegrine RA
    J Endod; 2019 Jul; 45(7):930-934. PubMed ID: 31109752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of Different Kinematics on Apical Extrusion of Irrigant and Debris during Canal Preparation Using K3XF Instruments.
    Toyoğlu M; Altunbaş D
    J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1565-1568. PubMed ID: 28735794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
    Ferraz CC; Gomes NV; Gomes BP; Zaia AA; Teixeira FB; Souza-Filho FJ
    Int Endod J; 2001 Jul; 34(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 11482718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of disruption of apical constriction on periapical extrusion.
    Tinaz AC; Alacam T; Uzun O; Maden M; Kayaoglu G
    J Endod; 2005 Jul; 31(7):533-5. PubMed ID: 15980716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques.
    Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Er K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 18230395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Apically-extruded debris using the ProTaper system.
    Azar NG; Ebrahimi G
    Aust Endod J; 2005 Apr; 31(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 15881729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of apical enlargement in cleaning and extrusion in canals with mild and moderate curvatures.
    Borges MF; Miranda CE; Silva SR; Marchesan M
    Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 21915518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using Vortex Blue, K3XF, ProTaper Next and Reciproc instruments.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Zan R; Akpek F; Topçuoğlu G; Ulusan Ö; Aktı A; Düzgün S; Ağırnaslıgil M
    Int Endod J; 2016 Dec; 49(12):1183-1187. PubMed ID: 26547513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation.
    van der Sluis LW; Gambarini G; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 16674742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of working length and apical preparation size on apical bacterial extrusion during reciprocating instrumentation.
    Teixeira JM; Cunha FM; Jesus RO; Silva EJ; Fidel SR; Sassone LM
    Int Endod J; 2015 Jul; 48(7):648-53. PubMed ID: 25087922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of Apical Preparation Size and Working Length on Debris Extrusion.
    Silva EJ; Teixeira JM; Kudsi N; Sassone LM; Krebs RL; Coutinho-Filho TS
    Braz Dent J; 2016; 27(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 27007341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative analysis of efficacy and cleaning ability of hand and rotary devices for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment: an in vitro study.
    Reddy N; Admala SR; Dinapadu S; Pasari S; Reddy MP; Rao MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):635-43. PubMed ID: 24309341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the self-adjusting file system.
    De-Deus GA; Nogueira Leal Silva EJ; Moreira EJ; de Almeida Neves A; Belladonna FG; Tameirão M
    J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):526-9. PubMed ID: 24666904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
    Er K; Sümer Z; Akpinar KE
    Int Endod J; 2005 Dec; 38(12):871-6. PubMed ID: 16343113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Apical extrusion of debris in flat-oval root canals after using different instrumentation systems.
    Kirchhoff AL; Fariniuk LF; Mello I
    J Endod; 2015 Feb; 41(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 25447504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris using Two Niti Systems Associated with Two İrrigation Techniques in Primary Teeth.
    Gungor OE; Kustarci A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):490-495. PubMed ID: 27805889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of Instrumentation Techniques and Kinematics on Apical Extrusion of Debris: An
    Haridas K; Hariharan M; Singh P; Varughese A; Ravi AB; Varma KR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Sep; 20(9):1067-1070. PubMed ID: 31797831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantitative Assessment of apically Extruded Bacteria using different Instrumentation Techniques and Preparation Taper.
    Priyank H; Pandey V; Sethi A; Sharma VJ; Bali H; Punia RS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):826-830. PubMed ID: 28874649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.