These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17639276)

  • 1. Value of two cone-beam computed tomography systems from an orthodontic point of view.
    Korbmacher H; Kahl-Nieke B; Schöllchen M; Heiland M
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Jul; 68(4):278-89. PubMed ID: 17639276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation.
    Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Bumann A; Visser H; Hirsch E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):640.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18456133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom).
    Lascala CA; Panella J; Marques MM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):291-4. PubMed ID: 15585804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics.
    Mah JK; Huang JC; Choo H
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Oct; 141 Suppl 3():7S-13S. PubMed ID: 20884934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two- and three-dimensional orthodontic imaging using limited cone beam-computed tomography.
    Nakajima A; Sameshima GT; Arai Y; Homme Y; Shimizu N; Dougherty H
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 16448229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of image quality for MSCT and CBCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial radiology applications.
    Loubele M; Maes F; Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D; White SC; Suetens P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):222-6. PubMed ID: 18583372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Digital radiology with storage phosphors in cephalometric study in orthodontics].
    Calderazzi A; Palla L; Battolla L; Caramella D; Barbieri L
    Radiol Med; 1992 Sep; 84(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 1410666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations.
    Holberg C; Steinhäuser S; Geis P; Rudzki-Janson I
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Nov; 66(6):434-44. PubMed ID: 16331544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cone-beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region--an update.
    Kau CH; Bozic M; English J; Lee R; Bussa H; Ellis RK
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Dec; 5(4):366-80. PubMed ID: 19777550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cone beam computed tomography: a useful tool in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
    Merrett SJ; Drage NA; Durning P
    J Orthod; 2009 Sep; 36(3):202-10. PubMed ID: 19741183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study for spatial resolution and subjective image characteristics of a multi-slice CT and a cone-beam CT for dental use.
    Watanabe H; Honda E; Tetsumura A; Kurabayashi T
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 19819091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT.
    Draenert FG; Coppenrath E; Herzog P; Müller S; Mueller-Lisse UG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 May; 36(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 17536086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of quality of reformatted images from two cone-beam computed tomographic systems.
    Schulze D; Heiland M; Blake F; Rother U; Schmelzle R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Feb; 33(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 15694145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Indications for cone beam computed tomography in children and young patients in a Turkish subpopulation.
    İşman Ö; Yılmaz HH; Aktan AM; Yilmaz B
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2017 May; 27(3):183-190. PubMed ID: 27452447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with intraoral photostimulable phosphor imaging plate for diagnosis of endodontic complications: a simulation study.
    Eskandarloo A; Mirshekari A; Poorolajal J; Mohammadi Z; Shokri A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Dec; 114(6):e54-61. PubMed ID: 22981099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of cone-beam computed tomography on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
    Hodges RJ; Atchison KA; White SC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):665-74. PubMed ID: 23631968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study.
    Loubele M; Maes F; Schutyser F; Marchal G; Jacobs R; Suetens P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 16876067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL; Howerton WB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 16798915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image quality of two different mobile cone beam computed tomographs for maxillofacial surgery.
    Seeberger R; Buchgeister M; Seethaler AC; Shiozawa T; Hoffmann J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):731-4. PubMed ID: 22361302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
    Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.