These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17639277)

  • 1. Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Greiner M; Greiner A; Hirschfelder U
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Jul; 68(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 17639277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
    Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
    Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.
    Ghoneima A; Albarakati S; Baysal A; Uysal T; Kula K
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23304973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms.
    Chang ZC; Hu FC; Lai E; Yao CC; Chen MH; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e289-97. PubMed ID: 22133963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique.
    Geelen W; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E; Kruger M; Hansson LG
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 9699411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
    Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Landmark identification on direct digital versus film-based cephalometric radiographs: a human skull study.
    Schulze RK; Gloede MB; Doll GM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Dec; 122(6):635-42. PubMed ID: 12490875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.
    Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Huang HW; Yao CC; Chang HF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 15585806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A comparison of standard radiographs and "scout-view" radiographs. The value for cephalometric analysis].
    Gigon S; Calonnec F; Kerbrat JB; Delcampe P; Peron JM
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1998 Nov; 99(4):181-3. PubMed ID: 10088187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on spiral computed tomography-derived three-dimensional images and its comparison with digital cephalometric radiography.
    Varghese S; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S; Vikraman B; Chithranjan A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 May; 39(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 20395462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Reliability of Anatomic Landmarks based on PA Cephalometric Radiographs and 3D CT Scans in Patients with Facial Asymmetry.
    Bajaj K; Rathee P; Jain P; Panwar VR
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2011; 4(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 27678229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precision of measurements on conventional negative 'bones white' and inverted greyscale 'bones black' digital lateral cephalograms.
    Borrie F; Thomson D; McIntyre GT
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 21300728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital imaging of cephalometric radiographs, Part 2: Image quality.
    Forsyth DB; Shaw WC; Richmond S; Roberts CT
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 8678345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a system for craniofacial analysis from monitor-displayed digital images.
    Gotfredsen E; Kragskov J; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 10522202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Perceptibility of details in conventional and digital teleradiography--a comparative study].
    Ruppenthal T; Doll G; Sergl HG; Fricke B
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 3():1033-42. PubMed ID: 1842243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of common hard tissue cephalometric measurements between computed tomography 3D reconstruction and conventional 2D cephalometric images.
    Yitschaky O; Redlich M; Abed Y; Faerman M; Casap N; Hiller N
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jan; 81(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 20936949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.