These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17639277)

  • 21. A new method for assessment of craniofacial malformations.
    Pelo S; Tassiello S; Boniello R; Gasparini G; Longobardi G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Nov; 17(6):1035-9. PubMed ID: 17119401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computerized digital enhancement in craniofacial cephalometric radiography.
    Eppley BL; Sadove AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1991 Oct; 49(10):1038-43. PubMed ID: 1890516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph.
    Olszewski R; Reychler H; Cosnard G; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Zech F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):261-7. PubMed ID: 18606747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ceph-X: development and evaluation of 2D cephalometric system.
    Mosleh MA; Baba MS; Malek S; Almaktari RA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 19):499. PubMed ID: 28155649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantitative analysis of spiral computed tomography for craniofacial clinical applications.
    Cavalcanti MG; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):344-50. PubMed ID: 10895633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of a programme of professional calibration in the variability of landmark identification using cone beam computed tomography-synthesized and conventional radiographic cephalograms.
    Delamare EL; Liedke GS; Vizzotto MB; da Silveira HL; Ribeiro JL; Silveira HE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):414-23. PubMed ID: 20841459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry: reliability of landmark identification.
    Lim KF; Foong KW
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 9459029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of the accuracy of cephalometric landmark location between two screen/film combinations.
    Stirrups DR
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 2774297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Quantitative analysis based on three-dimensional CT in the contouring surgery of craniofacial fibrous dysplasia].
    Ruichen W; Chunming L; Chiyu J; Guizhen L; Quanwen G; Hasi W; Yan H
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 May; 31(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 26536680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) - generated frontal cephalograms.
    Kim SJ; Park SB; Kim YI; Cho BH; Hwang DS
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e331-6. PubMed ID: 22444351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Repeatability and reproducibility of landmarks--a three-dimensional computed tomography study.
    Titiz I; Laubinger M; Keller T; Hertrich K; Hirschfelder U
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):276-86. PubMed ID: 21566086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cephalometric digitization: A determination of the minimum scanner settings necessary for precise landmark identification.
    Held CL; Ferguson DJ; Gallo MW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):472-81. PubMed ID: 11343018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms.
    Hagemann K; Vollmer D; Niegel T; Ehmer U; Reuter I
    J Orofac Orthop; 2000; 61(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 10783561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of Soft Tissue Landmark Reliability between Manual and Computerized Plotting Methods.
    Kasinathan G; Kommi PB; Kumar SM; Yashwant A; Arani N; Sabapathy S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Apr; 18(4):317-321. PubMed ID: 28349911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Potential and limitations of cephalometric analysis of maxillofacial bone movement in the case of LeFort III-distraction.
    Lippold C; Danesh G; Meyer U; Hohoff A; Kelker M; Kleinheinz J
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Sep; 66(5):388-96. PubMed ID: 16231114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nasal cavity perforation by palatal implants: false-positive records on the lateral cephalogram.
    Crismani AG; Bernhart T; Tangl S; Bantleon HP; Watzek G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 15839121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method.
    Muramatsu A; Nawa H; Kimura M; Yoshida K; Maeda M; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 18416622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparative analysis of angular cephalometric values between CBCT generated lateral cephalograms versus digitized conventional lateral cephalograms.
    Chung RR; Lagravere MO; Flores-Mir C; Heo G; Carey JP; Major PW
    Int Orthod; 2009 Dec; 7(4):308-21. PubMed ID: 20303918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fully Automatic System for Accurate Localisation and Analysis of Cephalometric Landmarks in Lateral Cephalograms.
    Lindner C; Wang CW; Huang CT; Li CH; Chang SW; Cootes TF
    Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():33581. PubMed ID: 27645567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.