BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17639506)

  • 1. Case-cohort methods for survival data on families from routine registers.
    Moger TA; Pawitan Y; Borgan O
    Stat Med; 2008 Mar; 27(7):1062-74. PubMed ID: 17639506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cancer risk in children with birth defects and in their families: a population based cohort study of 5.2 million children from Norway and Sweden.
    Bjørge T; Cnattingius S; Lie RT; Tretli S; Engeland A
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Mar; 17(3):500-6. PubMed ID: 18296646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods for testing familial aggregation of diseases in population-based samples: application to Hodgkin lymphoma in Swedish registry data.
    Pfeiffer RM; Goldin LR; Chatterjee N; Daugherty S; Hemminki K; Pee D; X LI; Gail MH
    Ann Hum Genet; 2004 Sep; 68(Pt 5):498-508. PubMed ID: 15469426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A shared frailty model for case-cohort samples: parent and offspring relations in an adoption study.
    Petersen L; Sørensen TI; Andersen PK
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):924-31. PubMed ID: 20213722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regression models for infant mortality data in Norwegian siblings, using a compound Poisson frailty distribution with random scale.
    Moger TA; Aalen OO
    Biostatistics; 2008 Jul; 9(3):577-91. PubMed ID: 18304994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Case-control and case-only designs with genotype and family history data: estimating relative risk, residual familial aggregation, and cumulative risk.
    Chatterjee N; Kalaylioglu Z; Shih JH; Gail MH
    Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 16542227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex differences in child and adolescent mortality in the Nordic countries, 1981--2000.
    Gissler M; Rahkonen O; Mortensen L; Arntzen A; Cnattingius S; Nybo Andersen AM; Hemminki E
    Scand J Public Health; 2009 Jun; 37(4):340-6. PubMed ID: 19286748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adjustment for misclassification in studies of familial aggregation of disease using routine register data.
    Andersen EW; Andersen PK
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(23):3595-607. PubMed ID: 12436458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A case-cohort design for assessing covariate effects in longitudinal studies.
    Pfeiffer RM; Ryan L; Litonjua A; Pee D
    Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):982-91. PubMed ID: 16401271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating survival in newly diagnosed cancer patients: use of computer simulations to evaluate performances of different approaches in a wide range of scenarios.
    Rashid I; Marcheselli L; Federico M
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2145-58. PubMed ID: 18095273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of testicular cancer data using a frailty model with familial dependence.
    Moger TA; Aalen OO; Heimdal K; Gjessing HK
    Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(4):617-32. PubMed ID: 14755393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The analysis of the influence of birth order and other factors in multiple birth data.
    Davidov O; Murad H; Lusky A; Shinwell ES; Reichman B; Freedman L
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3739-53. PubMed ID: 14673935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selecting an efficient design for assessing exposure-disease relationships in an assembled cohort.
    Wacholder S; Gail M; Pee D
    Biometrics; 1991 Mar; 47(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 2049514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design considerations for association studies of candidate genes in families.
    Bull SB; Darlington GA; Greenwood CM; Shin J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 20(2):149-74. PubMed ID: 11180444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Population lab": the creation of virtual populations for genetic epidemiology research.
    Leu M; Czene K; Reilly M
    Epidemiology; 2007 Jul; 18(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 17486019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of case-cohort data: a comparison of different methods.
    Onland-Moret NC; van der A DL; van der Schouw YT; Buschers W; Elias SG; van Gils CH; Koerselman J; Roest M; Grobbee DE; Peeters PH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 60(4):350-5. PubMed ID: 17346608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Archimedean copula model selection under dependent truncation.
    Beaudoin D; Lakhal-Chaieb L
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4440-54. PubMed ID: 18551531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Power calculation for case-cohort studies with nonrare events.
    Cai J; Zeng D
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1288-95. PubMed ID: 17608788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sampling for conditional inference on case-control data.
    Chen Y; Dinwoodie IH; MacGibbon B
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):845-55. PubMed ID: 17825015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multivariate survival analysis for case-control family data.
    Hsu L; Gorfine M
    Biostatistics; 2006 Jul; 7(3):387-98. PubMed ID: 16368774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.