235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17639530)
1. Public perceptions of biotechnology.
McHughen A
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1105-11. PubMed ID: 17639530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Options for a rational dialogue on the acceptance of biotechnology.
von Grebmer K; Omamo SW
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1121-8. PubMed ID: 17703485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transparent communication strategy on GMOs: will it change public opinion?
Sinemus K; Egelhofer M
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1141-6. PubMed ID: 17703492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bringing scientists to the people--the Co-Extra website.
Breyer D; Daubresse P; Sneyers M
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1081-5. PubMed ID: 17703490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The difficulty of structuring and focusing the co-existence debate in Europe.
Custers R
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1086-7. PubMed ID: 17703493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Talking biotech with the public.
Brauerhoch FO; Ewen C; Sinemus K
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1076-80. PubMed ID: 17703483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. About audience-specific communication.
Burlon O
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1070-1. PubMed ID: 17722182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Synthetic biology through the prism of scenarios.
Rutz B
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1072-5. PubMed ID: 17703494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Talking with the public--challenging the public scare.
Sinemus K
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1047. PubMed ID: 17768765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Future societal issues in industrial biotechnology.
Schuurbiers D; Osseweijer P; Kinderlerer J
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1112-20. PubMed ID: 17639531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Get up, stand up: stand up for your rights!--Private thoughts of a citizen.
Katzek JA
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1067-9. PubMed ID: 17722181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Communication of gene technology--a difficult enterprise: a journalist's view on biotech communication.
Spahl T; Deichmann T
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1064-6. PubMed ID: 17768770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Portals, blogs and co.: the role of the Internet as a medium of science communication.
Minol K; Spelsberg G; Schulte E; Morris N
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1129-40. PubMed ID: 17703484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk as a social phenomenon.
Jamison WV
Forum Nutr; 2003; 56():327-30. PubMed ID: 15806921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biotechnology: the language of multiple views in Māori communities.
Te Momo OH
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1179-83. PubMed ID: 17703491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technology and fear: is wonder the key?
Mordini E
Trends Biotechnol; 2007 Dec; 25(12):544-6. PubMed ID: 17996320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. GM foods and the misperception of risk perception.
Gaskell G; Allum N; Wagner W; Kronberger N; Torgersen H; Hampel J; Bardes J
Risk Anal; 2004 Feb; 24(1):185-94. PubMed ID: 15028010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perspective: Why communication in biotechnology is important.
Gassen HG
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1051-2. PubMed ID: 17768767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Health communication and public media: professionals need to be heard].
Meijman FJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Aug; 152(32):1760-4. PubMed ID: 18754306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chinese public understanding of the use of agricultural biotechnology--a case study from Zhejiang Province of China.
Lü L
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Apr; 7(4):257-66. PubMed ID: 16532526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
