These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17640410)
1. Central factors contributing to para-contrast modulation of contour and brightness perception. Breitmeyer BG; Ziegler R; Hauske G Vis Neurosci; 2007; 24(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 17640410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta- and paracontrast reveal differences between contour- and brightness-processing mechanisms. Breitmeyer BG; Kafaligönül H; Oğmen H; Mardon L; Todd S; Ziegler R Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2645-58. PubMed ID: 16563459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dichoptic visual masking reveals that early binocular neurons exhibit weak interocular suppression: implications for binocular vision and visual awareness. Macknik SL; Martinez-Conde S J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1049-59. PubMed ID: 15298791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Brief presentations reveal the temporal dynamics of brightness induction and White's illusion. Robinson AE; de Sa VR Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(22):2370-81. PubMed ID: 18723046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metacontrast masking of target-area internal contours and target overall surface brightness: the case of mutually coherent and incoherent visual objects. Bachmann T Spat Vis; 2009; 22(2):127-46. PubMed ID: 19228454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Binocular contrast interactions: dichoptic masking is not a single process. Baker DH; Meese TS Vision Res; 2007 Nov; 47(24):3096-107. PubMed ID: 17904610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A psychoanatomical investigation of the blanking phenomenon. McAnany JJ; Levine MW Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 15581920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of contrast polarity in paracontrast masking. Kafaligönül H; Breitmeyer BG; Ogmen H Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1576-87. PubMed ID: 19801617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry. Baker DH; Graf EW Vision Res; 2009 Feb; 49(4):451-9. PubMed ID: 19124036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: evidence for common processes. O'Shea RP; Parker A; La Rooy D; Alais D Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):671-81. PubMed ID: 19232529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Grouping and segmentation in binocular rivalry. Silver MA; Logothetis NK Vision Res; 2004; 44(14):1675-92. PubMed ID: 15136003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binocular switch suppression: a new method for persistently rendering the visible 'invisible'. Arnold DH; Law P; Wallis TS Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(8):994-1001. PubMed ID: 18329066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry share common perceptual dynamics. van Boxtel JJ; van Ee R; Erkelens CJ J Vis; 2007 Nov; 7(14):3.1-11. PubMed ID: 18217798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal frequency and contrast tagging bias the type of competition in interocular switch rivalry. Silver MA; Logothetis NK Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(4):532-43. PubMed ID: 17182075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychophysical evidence for two routes to suppression before binocular summation of signals in human vision. Baker DH; Meese TS; Summers RJ Neuroscience; 2007 Apr; 146(1):435-48. PubMed ID: 17346895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Competition in bistable vision is attribute-specific. Grossmann JK; Dobbins AC Vision Res; 2006 Feb; 46(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 16045956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low-level features determine brightness in White's and Benary's illusions. Salmela VR; Laurinen PI Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):682-90. PubMed ID: 19200439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]