These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17640502)

  • 21. Genetically modified foods: hazard identification and risk assessment. Session summary.
    Ito N
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2002 Jul; 54(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 12180803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perspective on OECD activities from a non-member country.
    Alexandrova N; Atanassov A
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 17640514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comment on "Session V: estimating likelihood and exposure", by Zaida Lentini, Environ. Biosafety Res. 5 (2006) 193-195.
    Digiovanni F; Kevan PG
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2008; 7(2):105-8; discussion 109-13. PubMed ID: 18549772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Towards the safe use of modern biotechnology. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms. October 10-16, 2002. Beijing, China.
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2003; 2(1):35-68. PubMed ID: 15685737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recommendations from the workshop on Comparative Approaches to Safety Assessment of GM Plant Materials: A road toward harmonized criteria?
    Bartholomaeus A; Batista JC; Burachik M; Parrott W
    GM Crops Food; 2015; 6(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 25706477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Basic framework for risk assessment for transgenic plants developed by the OECD: 20 years after the OECD "Blue Book".
    Bergmans H
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 17640511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Socioeconomics and the protocol on biosafety.
    Crompton T; Wakeford T
    Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Aug; 16(8):697-8. PubMed ID: 9702752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Innovative farmers and regulatory gatekeepers: Genetically modified crops regulation and adoption in developing countries.
    Sinebo W; Maredia K
    GM Crops Food; 2016 Jan; 7(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26954893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The OECD Blue Book on Recombinant DNA Safety Considerations: it's influence on ISBR and EFSA activities.
    Schiemann J
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):233-5. PubMed ID: 17640515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Challenges and opportunities in environmental biosafety research.
    Lu BR; Sweet J
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2010; 9(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 21261122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biotechnology and Biosafety Policy at OECD: Future Trends.
    Kearns PWE; Kleter GA; Bergmans HEN; Kuiper HA
    Trends Biotechnol; 2021 Oct; 39(10):965-969. PubMed ID: 33752894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. General principles for risk assessment of living modified organisms: lessons from chemical risk assessment.
    Hill RA; Sendashonga C
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2003; 2(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 15612274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of the OECD on the development of national/international risk/safety assessment frameworks.
    Gaugitsch H
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):219-22. PubMed ID: 17640512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Case studies on the use of biotechnologies and on biosafety provisions in four African countries.
    Black R; Fava F; Mattei N; Robert V; Seal S; Verdier V
    J Biotechnol; 2011 Dec; 156(4):370-81. PubMed ID: 21763362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Need for an "integrated safety assessment" of GMOs, linking food safety and environmental considerations.
    Haslberger AG
    J Agric Food Chem; 2006 May; 54(9):3173-80. PubMed ID: 16637668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Biotechnology and relevant aspects of the New Biosafety law].
    Naves BT; Freire de Sá Mde F
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2005; (22):85-102. PubMed ID: 16385792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The regulation of agricultural biotechnology: science shows a better way.
    Miller HI
    N Biotechnol; 2010 Nov; 27(5):628-34. PubMed ID: 20603236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Risk, regulation and biotechnology: the case of GM crops.
    Smyth SJ; Phillips PW
    GM Crops Food; 2014 Jul; 5(3):170-7. PubMed ID: 25437235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.
    Mandal GN
    William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Conservation biology, genetically modified organisms, and the biosafety protocol.
    Hill R; Sendashonga C
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1620-5. PubMed ID: 17181797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.