These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17640504)

  • 1. 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms. Session III: Identifying and defining hazards and potential consequences II.
    Sweet J
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):187-8. PubMed ID: 17640504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms. Session IV: Identifying and defining hazards and potential consequences III: Concepts for problem formulation and non-target risk assessment.
    Alvarez-Morales A
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):189-92. PubMed ID: 17640505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms. Session V: Estimating likelihood and exposure.
    Lentini Z
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):193-5. PubMed ID: 17640506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms. Session VI: Estimating likelihood and exposure, Part II.
    Quemada H
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):197-9. PubMed ID: 17640507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Geneflow from GM plants--towards a more quantitative risk assessment.
    Poppy GM
    Trends Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):436-8. PubMed ID: 15331221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms. Session II: Identifying and defining hazards and potential consequences I: Concepts for problem formulation and non-target risk assessment.
    Bigler F
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):183-6. PubMed ID: 17640503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consequences of gene flow.
    Snow AA
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2003; 2(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 15615067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms. Session VII: Risk management and monitoring.
    Schiemann J
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):201-3. PubMed ID: 17640508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk assessment of GM plants: avoiding gridlock?
    Wilkinson MJ; Sweet J; Poppy GM
    Trends Plant Sci; 2003 May; 8(5):208-12. PubMed ID: 12758037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Potential for gene flow from genetically modified Brassica napus on the territory of Russia.
    Mikhaylova EV; Kuluev BR
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Aug; 190(9):557. PubMed ID: 30159768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms. Session I: Biosafety research and risk assessment.
    McCammon SL
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):177-82. PubMed ID: 17640502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hybridization between Brassica napus and B. rapa on a national scale in the United Kingdom.
    Wilkinson MJ; Elliott LJ; Allainguillaume J; Shaw MW; Norris C; Welters R; Alexander M; Sweet J; Mason DC
    Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5644):457-9. PubMed ID: 14551318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discrimination of Transgenic Canola (
    Sohn SI; Pandian S; Zaukuu JZ; Oh YJ; Park SY; Na CS; Shin EK; Kang HJ; Ryu TH; Cho WS; Cho YS
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 35008646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Plant sciences. Will GM rapeseed cut the mustard?
    Heritage J
    Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5644):401-3. PubMed ID: 14563995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic Diversity of Oilseed Rape Fields and Feral Populations in the Context of Coexistence with GM Crops.
    Bailleul D; Ollier S; Lecomte J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0158403. PubMed ID: 27359342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comment on "Session V: estimating likelihood and exposure", by Zaida Lentini, Environ. Biosafety Res. 5 (2006) 193-195.
    Digiovanni F; Kevan PG
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2008; 7(2):105-8; discussion 109-13. PubMed ID: 18549772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mitigation using a tandem construct containing a selectively unfit gene precludes establishment of Brassica napus transgenes in hybrids and backcrosses with weedy Brassica rapa.
    Al-Ahmad H; Gressel J
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2006 Jan; 4(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 17177782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interspecific Hybridization of Transgenic
    Sohn SI; Thamilarasan SK; Pandian S; Oh YJ; Ryu TH; Lee GS; Shin EK
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic load and transgenic mitigating genes in transgenic Brassica rapa (field mustard) x Brassica napus (oilseed rape) hybrid populations.
    Rose CW; Millwood RJ; Moon HS; Rao MR; Halfhill MD; Raymer PL; Warwick SI; Al-Ahmad H; Gressel J; Stewart CN
    BMC Biotechnol; 2009 Oct; 9():93. PubMed ID: 19878583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hybridisation and introgression between Brassica napus and B. rapa in the Netherlands.
    Luijten SH; Schidlo NS; Meirmans PG; de Jong TJ
    Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2015 Jan; 17(1):262-7. PubMed ID: 24889091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.