These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17640509)

  • 21. Trace and traceability--a call for regulatory harmony.
    Ramessar K; Capell T; Twyman RM; Quemada H; Christou P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):975-8. PubMed ID: 18779799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. GM crops in Africa: challenges in Egypt.
    Abdallah N
    GM Crops; 2010; 1(3):116-9. PubMed ID: 21844668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms. Session II: Identifying and defining hazards and potential consequences I: Concepts for problem formulation and non-target risk assessment.
    Bigler F
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):183-6. PubMed ID: 17640503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Introduction: HESI workshop on evaluating biological variation in non-transgenic crops.
    Kough JL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 58(3 Suppl):S1. PubMed ID: 21081207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transgenic crops. China takes a bumpy road from the lab to the field.
    Yimin D; Mervis J
    Science; 2002 Dec; 298(5602):2317-9. PubMed ID: 12493892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A framework for designing transgenic crops--science, safety and citizen's concerns.
    König A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1274-9. PubMed ID: 14595351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Innovative farmers and regulatory gatekeepers: Genetically modified crops regulation and adoption in developing countries.
    Sinebo W; Maredia K
    GM Crops Food; 2016 Jan; 7(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26954893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
    Smyth S; McHughen A
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. EC struggles to unravel regulations.
    Hodgson J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jul; 18(7):705-6. PubMed ID: 10888826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops.
    Dale PJ; Clarke B; Fontes EM
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):567-74. PubMed ID: 12042859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. BIOTECHNOLOGY. Europe's rifts over transgenic crops deepen at key deadline.
    Rabesandratana T
    Science; 2015 Oct; 350(6256):18-9. PubMed ID: 26430094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Orgenic plants: gene-manipulated plants compatible with organic farming.
    Ryffel GU
    Biotechnol J; 2012 Nov; 7(11):1328-31. PubMed ID: 22893621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bringing policy relevance and scientific discipline to environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops.
    Herman RA; Garcia-Alonso M; Layton R; Raybould A
    Trends Biotechnol; 2013 Sep; 31(9):493-6. PubMed ID: 23973171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biotechnology. Japanese controversies over transgenic crop regulation.
    Watanabe KN; Taeb M; Okusu H
    Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5690):1572. PubMed ID: 15361611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Access issues may determine whether agri-biotech will help the world's poor.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1999 Nov; 402(6760):341-5. PubMed ID: 10586858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of protein safety in the context of agricultural biotechnology.
    Delaney B; Astwood JD; Cunny H; Conn RE; Herouet-Guicheney C; Macintosh S; Meyer LS; Privalle L; Gao Y; Mattsson J; Levine M;
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 May; 46 Suppl 2():S71-97. PubMed ID: 18348900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Redesigning evolution?
    Nader C; Herbert MR; Billings PR; Bereano PL; Hubbard R; King J; Krimsky S; Newman SA; Stabinsky D
    Science; 1999 Sep; 285(5433):1491; author reply 1492. PubMed ID: 10498533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. GM crops and the rat digestive tract: A critical review.
    Fluegge K
    Environ Int; 2015 Nov; 84():213-4. PubMed ID: 26271693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intellectual property reform for genetically modified crops: a legal imperative.
    López CS
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2004; 20(2):367-434. PubMed ID: 15239363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative safety assessment for biotech crops.
    Kok EJ; Kuiper HA
    Trends Biotechnol; 2003 Oct; 21(10):439-44. PubMed ID: 14512230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.