These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17640513)
21. Current status of regulating biotechnology-derived animals in Canada: animal health and food safety considerations. Kochhar HP; Evans BR Theriogenology; 2007 Jan; 67(1):188-97. PubMed ID: 17097725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Substantial equivalence: its uses and abuses. Miller HI Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Nov; 17(11):1042-3. PubMed ID: 10545866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars. McHughen A; Smyth S Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Jan; 6(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 17956539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Europe edges closer to GMO patent harmonization. Spillmann-Fürst I Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Sep; 17(9):842-3. PubMed ID: 10471913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Objective assessment of transgenic salmon. Gray G Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6926):889. PubMed ID: 12606971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Attitudes of the public and scientists to biotechnology in Japan at the start of 2000. Ng MA; Takeda C; Watanabe T; Macer D Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth; 2000 Jul; 10(4):106-13. PubMed ID: 16273712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Beyond the Blue Book. Framework for Risk/Safety Assessment of Transgenic Plants. An overview of the workshop. Kobayashi M; Kearns P Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):207-9. PubMed ID: 17640509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. US and biologists wary of strict biotech rules. Cyranoski D Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6978):6. PubMed ID: 14999250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Swiss biotech. Government shoots down GM plant trials. Weiss G Science; 2001 Dec; 294(5549):2067-9. PubMed ID: 11739923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms. Session I: Biosafety research and risk assessment. McCammon SL Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):177-82. PubMed ID: 17640502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Industry scientists look for benefits, not risks. Hötzel MJ Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6903):111. PubMed ID: 12226636 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of protein safety in the context of agricultural biotechnology. Delaney B; Astwood JD; Cunny H; Conn RE; Herouet-Guicheney C; Macintosh S; Meyer LS; Privalle L; Gao Y; Mattsson J; Levine M; Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 May; 46 Suppl 2():S71-97. PubMed ID: 18348900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. OECD international principles for biotechnology safety. A ten year programme for the harmonisation and coordination of safety policies. Teso B Australas Biotechnol; 1993; 3(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 7763621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Leveling the field: answers to frequently asked questions about the Cartagena Biosafety Protocol. Freeman L Genewatch; 2003; 16(6):12-4. PubMed ID: 15255003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Databases on biotechnology and biosafety of GMOs. Degrassi G; Alexandrova N; Ripandelli D Environ Biosafety Res; 2003; 2(3):145-60. PubMed ID: 15612413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. European disarray on transgenic crops. Abbott A Nature; 2009 Feb; 457(7232):946. PubMed ID: 19238685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Transgenic aubergines put on ice. Jayaraman KS Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7267):1041. PubMed ID: 19847236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]