These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17640514)

  • 1. Perspective on OECD activities from a non-member country.
    Alexandrova N; Atanassov A
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 17640514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The OECD Blue Book on Recombinant DNA Safety Considerations: it's influence on ISBR and EFSA activities.
    Schiemann J
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):233-5. PubMed ID: 17640515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of the OECD on the development of national/international risk/safety assessment frameworks.
    Gaugitsch H
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):219-22. PubMed ID: 17640512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Current harmonization activities related to risk/safety assessment by the OECD Working Group on Harmonization of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology.
    MacDonald P; Yarrow S
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 17640513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The OECD Blue Book has become a citation classic.
    Balázs E
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):211-2. PubMed ID: 17640510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Basic framework for risk assessment for transgenic plants developed by the OECD: 20 years after the OECD "Blue Book".
    Bergmans H
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 17640511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Japanese experience with the Blue Book and subsequent activities in environmental biosafety of GM crops.
    Hayashi K
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):237-8. PubMed ID: 17640516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experiences from the implementation of a biosafety system in Slovenia.
    Milavec M; Racman DS
    Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1093-104. PubMed ID: 17703486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Need for an "integrated safety assessment" of GMOs, linking food safety and environmental considerations.
    Haslberger AG
    J Agric Food Chem; 2006 May; 54(9):3173-80. PubMed ID: 16637668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. International harmonization for the risk assessment of pesticides: results of an IPCS survey.
    Dragula C; Burin G
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Dec; 20(3 Pt 1):337-53. PubMed ID: 7724837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current state of the implementation of the OECD GLP principles in the OECD member countries and non-member economies in light of the outcome of the 1998-2002 pilot project of mutual joint visits.
    Turnheim D
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2008; 44(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 19351989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nutritional and safety assessment of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology--case studies by the International Food Biotechnology Committee of ILSI.
    Glenn KC
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():229-32. PubMed ID: 18296343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nutritional and safety assessments of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology: case studies: executive summary of a task force report by the International Life Sciences Institute, Washington, D.C.
    International Life Sciences Institute
    J Food Sci; 2007 Nov; 72(9):R131-7. PubMed ID: 18034742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. OECD principles of GLP: what is working and what needs work.
    Viswanathan CT
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2008; 44(4):341-3. PubMed ID: 19351992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The organization for economic cooperation and development: challenges for risk assessment.
    McCammon SL
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 17640517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety assessment considerations for food and feed derived from plants with genetic modifications that modulate endogenous gene expression and pathways.
    Kier LD; Petrick JS
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Aug; 46(8):2591-605. PubMed ID: 18602733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Key elements in a strategic approach to capacity building in the biosafety of genetically modified organisms.
    Araya-Quesada M; Degrassi G; Ripandelli D; Craig W
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2010; 9(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 21134346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Relationship of genetically modified crops with the environment and health of the Costa Rican human population].
    Espinoza AM; Arrieta-Espinoza G; Sittenfeld A
    Rev Biol Trop; 2004 Sep; 52(3):727-32. PubMed ID: 17361565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attitudes of the public and scientists to biotechnology in Japan at the start of 2000.
    Ng MA; Takeda C; Watanabe T; Macer D
    Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth; 2000 Jul; 10(4):106-13. PubMed ID: 16273712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.