These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17640515)

  • 1. The OECD Blue Book on Recombinant DNA Safety Considerations: it's influence on ISBR and EFSA activities.
    Schiemann J
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):233-5. PubMed ID: 17640515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perspective on OECD activities from a non-member country.
    Alexandrova N; Atanassov A
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 17640514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The OECD Blue Book has become a citation classic.
    Balázs E
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):211-2. PubMed ID: 17640510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of the OECD on the development of national/international risk/safety assessment frameworks.
    Gaugitsch H
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):219-22. PubMed ID: 17640512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current harmonization activities related to risk/safety assessment by the OECD Working Group on Harmonization of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology.
    MacDonald P; Yarrow S
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 17640513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Japanese experience with the Blue Book and subsequent activities in environmental biosafety of GM crops.
    Hayashi K
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):237-8. PubMed ID: 17640516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Basic framework for risk assessment for transgenic plants developed by the OECD: 20 years after the OECD "Blue Book".
    Bergmans H
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 17640511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transnationalizing recombinant-DNA regulation: between Asilomar, EMBO, the OECD, and the European Community.
    Gottweis H
    Sci Cult (Lond); 2005 Dec; 14(4):325-38. PubMed ID: 16619468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Need for an "integrated safety assessment" of GMOs, linking food safety and environmental considerations.
    Haslberger AG
    J Agric Food Chem; 2006 May; 54(9):3173-80. PubMed ID: 16637668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution.
    Hoffman DE
    Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 9th International Symposium on the Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms. Session VII: Risk management and monitoring.
    Schiemann J
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):201-3. PubMed ID: 17640508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety assessment of food products from r-DNA animals.
    Lema MA; Burachik M
    Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis; 2009 Mar; 32(2):163-89. PubMed ID: 18258300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current status of regulating biotechnology-derived animals in Canada: animal health and food safety considerations.
    Kochhar HP; Evans BR
    Theriogenology; 2007 Jan; 67(1):188-97. PubMed ID: 17097725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beyond the Blue Book. Framework for Risk/Safety Assessment of Transgenic Plants. An overview of the workshop.
    Kobayashi M; Kearns P
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(4):207-9. PubMed ID: 17640509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk assessment for release of genetically modified organisms: a virus to reduce the fertility of introduced wild mice, Mus domesticus.
    Williams CK
    Reprod Suppl; 2002; 60():81-8. PubMed ID: 12220167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the biosafety of cell sorting by adaptation of a cell sorting system to a biosafety cabinet.
    Lennartz K; Lu M; Flasshove M; Moritz T; Kirstein U
    Cytometry A; 2005 Aug; 66(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 15973698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regulatory considerations in the development and application of biotechnology in Japan.
    Yamanouchi K
    Rev Sci Tech; 2005 Apr; 24(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 16110881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Leveling the field: answers to frequently asked questions about the Cartagena Biosafety Protocol.
    Freeman L
    Genewatch; 2003; 16(6):12-4. PubMed ID: 15255003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current state of the implementation of the OECD GLP principles in the OECD member countries and non-member economies in light of the outcome of the 1998-2002 pilot project of mutual joint visits.
    Turnheim D
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2008; 44(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 19351989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.